Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0164% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$43kInternational$14kPhilanthropy$6kHealth$6kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kCrime & Legal$790Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$666k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP MOSHAVA$6,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$5,000
SCHECHTER SCHOOL$5,000
TORAH LIVE INC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
JUST ONE CHESED INC$3,000
YESHIVAT SHA'ALVIM$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,750
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 48% of grant dollars ($80k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 52% that went abroad ($88k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY SERV: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
TX

Beyond the US: 52% of all-years giving ($88k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$88k · 25 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charitalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 52% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 7 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
33

Total granted

$40k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
0%

Still filing today

57%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +56%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +98%
  • EM
    EZER MIZION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $59k
  • KH
    KEREN HACHESED
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Israel Medical Fund Corp

To provide guidance and support to families with ill or physically disabled family members

Human Services
3
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
4
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
5
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
8
Zichron Tzvi Elimelech

Assists thousands of needy individuals, families and multiplecharities in Israel and North America.

—
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
11
Israel Healthcare Foundation Inc

To assist israelis, by providing grants to hospitals and clinics in israel.

Health
12
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $59,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTORAH LIVE INC 2480: $10,000 · OtherTORAH LIVE INC 2480OHR TORAH: $7,800 · OtherOHR TORAHCAMP MOSHAVA: $6,000 · OtherKEREN HACHESED: $5,368 · OtherSCHECHTER SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+28 more: $26,070 · Other+28 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL…Just One Chesed Inc: $6,000 · PhilanthropyJust One C…CAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsCentral Fund of Israel: $4,030 · InternationalEZER MIZION: $2,080 · InternationalOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesTORAH LIVE INC: $4,000 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $540 · ReligionTOMCHEI ISRAEL: $180 · ReligionAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,100 · HealthTHE RIGHT CARE NOW PROJECT INC: $500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $100 · Health
Other$124,348Philanthropy$16,000Recreation & Sports$9,000International$6,110Human Services$5,000Religion$4,720Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $4,030 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH LIVE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEZER MIZION: $2,080 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI ISRAEL: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds Just One Chesed Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds TORAH LIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE RIGHT CARE NOW PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Ojc Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita?

    Find your warmest path to The Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph Katz and Shirley Katz Charita’s filings →

    More from the funding graph