Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$116kHealth$89kScience & Tech$78kRecreation & Sports$48kHuman Services$43kArts & Culture$36kReligion$27kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$514k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONPOINT QUEENS$18,000
GIBNEY DANCE INC$5,000
UJA FEDERATION$5,000
WOMENS GUILD CEDARS SINAI$3,600
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY$2,500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$2,500
MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION$2,500
MISC$2,000
ST MARYS HOSPITAL$2,000
QUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION$2,000
MOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU$1,000
LIFE'S ANGELS INC$1,000
GERSTMAN FOUNDATION$1,000
QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE DAYCAMP LONG ISLAND: $1k → 7%SUNRISE DAYCAMP LONG ISLAND: $1k → 7%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%COMMONPOINT QUEENS: $23k → 13%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%COMMONPOINT QUEENS: $18k → 13%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 29 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
20

Total granted

$348k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+37%

Still filing today

34%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COMMONPOINT NY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $41k · revenue +10%
  • HI
    HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +80%
  • QC
    QUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SF
    SANUEL FIELD Y
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • TS
    TEMPLE SINAI OF ROSLYN
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • VH
    VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Queens Library Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Milana Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION COLLEGE: $61,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGETRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGEGIBNEY DANCE INC: $35,500 · OtherGIBNEY DANCE INCSANUEL FIELD Y: $30,000 · OtherSANUEL FIELD YCOMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $16,500 · OtherST MARYS HOSPITAL: $12,100 · OtherQUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION: $11,000 · Other+30 more: $108,570 · Other+30 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $78,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY …+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalCOMMONPOINT NY INC: $40,500 · Human ServicesCOMMONPOINT…BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $8,200 · Human ServicesBRAIN TUMOR…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesHEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC: $11,300 · HealthVOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE: $7,500 · HealthLIFES ANGELS INC co Brett Dunne: $4,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,180 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,800 · PhilanthropyTHE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC: $3,250 · PhilanthropyHOUSING WORKS INC: $2,800 · Community ImprovementThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $1,250 · Education
Other$324,670International$80,500Human Services$50,700Health$29,480Philanthropy$25,550Community Improvement$2,800Education$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $78,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMONPOINT NY INC: $40,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC: $11,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION: $11,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $8,200 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetVOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFES ANGELS INC co Brett Dunne: $4,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC: $3,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBayside Business Association: $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMONPOINT NY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFES ANGELS INC co Brett Dunne ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds RILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph