Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE JOSEPH & BERNICE TANENBAUM FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$514k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONPOINT QUEENS$18,000
UJA FEDERATION$5,000
GIBNEY DANCE INC$5,000
WOMENS GUILD CEDARS SINAI$3,600
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY$2,500
MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION$2,500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$2,500
MISC$2,000
ST MARYS HOSPITAL$2,000
QUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HEAD INJURY ASSOC$1,000
MOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU$1,000
GERSTMAN FOUNDATION$1,000
QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE DAYCAMP LONG ISLAND: $1k → 7%SUNRISE DAYCAMP LONG ISLAND: $1k → 7%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%COMMONPOINT QUEENS: $23k → 13%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%COMMONPOINT QUEENS: $18k → 13%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$348k · 29 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
20

Total granted

$348k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+37%

Still filing today

34%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COMMONPOINT NY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $41k · revenue +10%
  • HI
    HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +80%
  • QC
    QUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SF
    SANUEL FIELD Y
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • TS
    TEMPLE SINAI OF ROSLYN
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • VH
    VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Queens Library Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Milana Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr21%14%10–20yr21%41%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr11%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr21%6%10–20yr21%36%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr11%44%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
11%
6,705/61,063

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNION COLLEGE — $61,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGETRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE — $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGEGIBNEY DANCE INC — $35,500 · OtherGIBNEY DANCE INCSANUEL FIELD Y — $30,000 · OtherSANUEL FIELD YCOMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE — $16,500 · OtherST MARYS HOSPITAL — $12,100 · OtherQUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION — $11,000 · Other+30 more — $108,570 · Other+30 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $78,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY …+1 more — $2,500 · InternationalCOMMONPOINT NY INC — $40,500 · Human ServicesCOMMONPOINT…BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION — $8,200 · Human ServicesBRAIN TUMOR…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesHEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC — $11,300 · HealthVOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE — $7,500 · HealthLIFES ANGELS INC co Brett Dunne — $4,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,180 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,800 · PhilanthropyTHE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $3,250 · PhilanthropyHOUSING WORKS INC — $2,800 · Community ImprovementThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $1,250 · Education
Other$324,670International$80,500Human Services$50,700Health$29,480Philanthropy$25,550Community Improvement$2,800Education$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $78,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMONPOINT NY INC — $40,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC — $11,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION — $11,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION — $8,200 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetVOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFES ANGELS INC co Brett Dunne — $4,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $3,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC — $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBayside Business Association — $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds COMMONPOINT NY INC
  • Who funds HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds QUEENS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds LIFES ANGELS INC co Brett Dunne
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds RILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Joseph & Bernice Tanenbaum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph