Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jordan Zimmerman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$563k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$438k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.6MHuman Services$48kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$33kInternational$26kCommunity Improvement$20kYouth Development$10kCivil Rights$8kAnimals$6kOther$1.2M
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $438k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$521k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION$437,500
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION$100,000
OPERATION MORDECHAI INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$10,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PERC INC: $3k → 10%AUTONATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NEW ENGLAND: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
TN
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 13 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$3.5M
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+18%

Still filing today

62%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $888k · revenue +36%
  • PC
    PINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $865k · revenue +54%
  • University of South Florida Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $761k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
9
Alcides E Rosaura Diniz Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…

10
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
11
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
12
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is D3 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersYouth Development CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPublic School District Foun…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsUnited Way FederationsPublic University Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%94%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $887,500 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INCPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $864,500 · EducationPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc — $761,000 · EducationUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc+2 more — $51,000 · EducationCLEVELAND CLINIC — $417,440 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYHADASSAH — $200,000 · OtherHADASSAHREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHI…+18 more — $187,680 · Other+18 moreAUTONATION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesP E R C INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC — $25,000 · HealthPLACE OF HOPE INC — $8,500 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 · Health+1 more — $700 · HealthUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $12,500 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Acadiana — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $100 · PhilanthropyJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $25,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc — $1,000 · InternationalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Education$2,564,000Other$1,205,120Human Services$47,500Health$38,200Philanthropy$32,600International$26,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $887,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $864,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc — $761,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUTONATION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Acadiana — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $8,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $5,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetP E R C INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER AGUIRRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DARBSTER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetD3 FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jordan Zimmerman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • United Way Miami Inc23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc0% of income from government
  • Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jordan Zimmerman Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jordan Zimmerman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph