Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jonathan Madding Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$473kEducation$342kPhilanthropy$181kHealth$112kHuman Services$16kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$745k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH$50,000
HEARTS TOUCHING HEARTS FOUNDATION$45,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH$20,338
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION GRADE SCHOOL$10,000
VISITATION CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
ST JAMES & ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH$7,000
IC DAYBREAK OF ELMHURST$5,000
FRANCISIAN MISSION OUTREACH$5,000
MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
EASTER SEALS DUPAGE AND THE FOX VALLEY REGION$3,500
ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
GRACE METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION FOOD PANTRY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WATERLEAF WOMENS CENTER INC: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
IA
OH
NJ
UT
NC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 21 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
20

Total granted

$1.1M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+20%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HEARTS TOUCHING HEARTSFOUNDATIONINC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +32%
  • TT
    Tree Town Cooperative Nursery
    5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +76%
  • SG
    St Gerard Campus
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • FM
    FRANCISCAN MISSION OUTREACH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SS
    ST SYMPHOROSA CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • RH
    ROSARY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

—
5
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
6
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
7
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Schenectady Day Nursery Inc

Child day care services

Human Services
10
Educational Child Care Center

Educational child care center (ec3) provides developmentally appropriate child care in a nurturing environment that promotes growth of the whole child while responding to the needs of the family.

Human Services
11
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
12
First United Methodist Church Child Development Center

Operation of a daycare program for children.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victory Junction Gang Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hearts Touching Heartsfoundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $217,750 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCHST TERESA HIGH SCHOOL: $175,000 · OtherST TERESA HIGH SCHOOLST MARY'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherST MARY'S HOSPITALIMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH: $91,453 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISHHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $83,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH: $55,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCHIMMACULATE CONCEPTION GRADE SCHOOL: $35,000 · Other+32 more: $167,500 · Other+32 moreHEARTS TOUCHING HEARTSFOUNDATIONINC: $180,450 · PhilanthropyHEARTS TOUCHING H…Tree Town Cooperative Nursery: $13,500 · EducationBUTTONS & BOWS NURSERY SCHOOL INC % JAMI SHARKO: $5,000 · EducationMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationMACON RESOURCES INC: $4,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $3,500 · HealthSOMC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $5,000 · ReligionELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $3,500 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE MISSIONS INC: $2,500 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $500 · International
Other$924,703Philanthropy$180,450Education$23,500Health$9,000Religion$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,500International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARTS TOUCHING HEARTSFOUNDATIONINC: $180,450 over 5y, 21% of budgetTree Town Cooperative Nursery: $13,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetSt Gerard Campus: $9,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBUTTONS & BOWS NURSERY SCHOOL INC % JAMI SHARKO: $5,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACON RESOURCES INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSIONS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetMACON COUNTY FAIR ASSN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWaterleaf Women's Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOMC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEARTS TOUCHING HEARTSFOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds Tree Town Cooperative Nursery ↗
  • Who funds St Gerard Campus ↗
  • Who funds BUTTONS & BOWS NURSERY SCHOOL INC % JAMI SHARKO ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MACON RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MACON COUNTY FAIR ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds Waterleaf Women's Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOMC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Andreas FoundationMI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Andreas Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jonathan Madding Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jonathan Madding Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jonathan Madding’s filings →

    More from the funding graph