Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The John W Harris Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$1.1MRecreation & Sports$503kHuman Services$459kEnvironment$167kPhilanthropy$111kInternational$69kReligion$61kHealth$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
World Vision$10,000
Woodberry Forest School$5,000
UNC Charlotte Athletic Foundation$5,000
NC Sports Hall of Fame$5,000
Foundation for the Carolinas$1,000
Cypress Point Caddie Emergency Fund$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $200k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OH
CA
VA
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 15 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
34

Total granted

$2.2M
$259k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+26%

Still filing today

67%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $750k · revenue +36%
  • TE
    THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $580k · revenue +97%
  • WF
    WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2024 · $86k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • NH
    NC Heels4Life Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +82%
  • JA
    Junior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue -32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Childrens Fund

To make strategic, catalytic investments and provide expertise and technical assistance to educational organizations across south carolina.

Education
2
North Carolina Foundation for Public School Children

To provide basic necessities for public school children as well as improving parenting skills in order for the children to be successful in school and to expand professional development opportunities for educators.

Philanthropy
3
Charlotte Sports Foundation

The Charlotte Sports Foundation is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization created in 2013 to provide leadership for sports-based initiatives that enhance the economy and quality of life in the Charlotte region. We provide unique events and…

Recreation & Sports
4
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
5
Charlotte Hornets Foundation Inc

Through the investment of time, talents, and treasure, the charlotte hornets foundation will support, promote, and enhance important community efforts that enrich the quality of life for those in need, especially children and youth…

Philanthropy
6
Chanticleer Athletic Foundation

Providing financial assistance to student athletes at coastal carolina university

Education
7
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
8
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
9
Carolinas Golf Foundation

The carolinas golf foundation was formed by the carolinas golf association in 1977 to provide scholarships and funding for a variety of carolinas-based golf initiatives.

10
Charlotte Regional Realtor Association Inc

The charlotte regional realtor (r) association (crra) is a trade association serving members in mecklenburg, iredell and haywood counties. at december 31, 2024, crra had 14,020 members.

11
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education
12
Carolinas Credit Union Foundation

To provide educational scholarships, and to provide assistance to credit unions in north and south carolina, and special projects.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsPublic University Foundatio…Cancer Support OrganizationsEducation Equity LeadershipFallen First Responder Supp…Food Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Arts OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Christian Missionary Organi…Professional Ballet Compani…Community FoundationsYmca Community Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%33%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr12%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr14%7%20–35yr12%50%35–55yr12%40%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,145

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $580,000 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCTREES CHARLOTTE FOUNDATION — $156,667 · OtherTREES CHARLOTTE FOUNDATIONNC Heels4Life Inc — $100,000 · OtherNC Heels4Life IncPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA — $51,000 · OtherTHE SPRINGS — $50,000 · Other+22 more — $78,075 · Other+22 moreCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS — $750,000 · EducationCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLSWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL — $86,000 · EducationWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL+10 more — $122,000 · Education+10 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE — $300,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S C…CAROLINAS GOLF ASSOCIATION — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC — $50,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $84,000 · PhilanthropyJANES FUND — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyPebble Beach Company Foundation — $6,300 · PhilanthropyHOOPTEE CHARITIES INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD VISION INC — $45,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc — $18,000 · InternationalWorld Affairs Council of Charlotte — $6,000 · International+1 more — $500 · InternationalCharlotte Mecklenburg Police Foundation — $21,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,015,742Education$958,000Human Services$300,000Recreation & Sports$116,000Philanthropy$115,300International$69,500Public Safety & Disaster$21,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS — $750,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $580,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE — $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL — $86,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $84,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC — $50,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAllegro Foundation Inc — $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPUT ON THE BRAKES INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Mecklenburg Police Foundation — $21,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCAROLINA YOUTH COALITION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJunior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc — $18,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCarolina Raptor Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJANES FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLeighton Ford Ministries Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetJIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation — $6,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWorld Affairs Council of Charlotte — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOOPTEE CHARITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetECHO FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATHLETIC FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITADEL BRIGADIER FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHV3 FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION — $975 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLwala Community Alliance — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC25.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Albemarle Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Hendrick Family Foundation · C D Spangler Foundation Inc · Dowd Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Equitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The John W Harris Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The John W Harris Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The John W Harris Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph