Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$60kHuman Services$58kHealth$6kEducation$5kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$2kCommunity Improvement$2kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PIUS X CATHOLIC CHURCH$7,960
ST GREGORY THE GREAT CATHOLIC CH$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,125
YMCA$1,940
A COMMUNITY CLINC$1,050
MOSTLY MUTTS DOG SHELTER$620
FOR GOOD CAMPAIGN (SALVATION ARMY)$500
ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH$500
SUSQ VALLEY UNITED WAY$500
RCAA HEALTH SERVICES$500
UNBOUND$432
EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSP$300
SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL BOOSTERS$250
MOUNT SAINT MARY UNIVERSITY$250
FATHER FRED SACRED HEART$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REAL LIFE CHILDRENS RANCH: $100 → 20%UNBOUND: $500 → 16%UNBOUND: $472 → 16%UNBOUND: $472 → 16%UNBOUND: $432 → 16%UNBOUND: $432 → 16%UNBOUND: $432 → 16%UNBOUND: $432 → 16%YMCA: $6k → 14%YMCA: $5k → 14%YMCA: $4k → 14%YMCA: $4k → 14%YMCA: $4k → 14%YMCA: $3k → 14%YMCA: $2k → 14%YMCA: $2k → 14%YMCA: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MA
OR
PA
CA
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 35 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
33

Total granted

$143k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+2%

Still filing today

29%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YMCA OF THE ROSES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +117%
  • AC
    A COMMUNITY CLINIC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +8%
  • EC
    EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
    5× · 2019–2025 · $1k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -16%
  • TS
    THE SERVICE DOG INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $550
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $528
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Susquehanna Physician Services

Susquehanna physician services is a subsidiary of the exempt entity upmc suquehanna. our vision is to create an integrated community health system that delivers world class care. our values are to carefully place our patients and their…

Health
3
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Upmc Muncy

Muncy Valley Hospital is a subsidiary of the exempt entity UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through…

Health
5
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
6
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
7
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
8
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
9
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
11
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
12
DuBois Regional Medical Center

To provide the patient with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life. it's the vision of the system to be the integrated health system of choice through excellent quality, service…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Giving Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PIUS X CATHOLIC CHURCH: $38,982 · OtherST PIUS X CATHOLIC CHURCHCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20,575 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESST GREGORY THE GREAT CATHOLIC CH: $10,000 · OtherST GREGORY THE GREAT CATHOLIC CHIndividual grant recipient: $7,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+50 more: $29,487 · Other+50 moreYMCA OF THE ROSES: $31,659 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROSESUnbound: $3,172 · Human ServicesUnbound+2 more: $400 · Human ServicesA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $2,640 · HealthRCAA HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,500 · HealthEVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $1,300 · HealthGEISINGER HEALTH: $710 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $645 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · ReligionPARADISUS DEI INC: $450 · ReligionTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $120 · ReligionMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $350 · EducationLOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $200 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $100 · EducationCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH MINISTRIES: $400 · Youth Development
Other$106,324Human Services$35,231Health$6,350Philanthropy$1,645Religion$1,570Education$850Youth Development$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $31,659 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUnbound: $3,172 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $2,640 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetEVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH: $710 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $645 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARADISUS DEI INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH MINISTRIES: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSTLY MUTTS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPGA FOUNDATION INC: $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReal Life Children's Ranch Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA OPPORTUNITIES INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOR: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds RCAA HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARADISUS DEI INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Giving FoundationPA26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Giving Foundation · The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · William J and Ann M Roll Foundation · Sunbury Northumberland Commtr · 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · S Luther Savidge Trust · Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · Guyer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Real Life Children's Ranch Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Barbara Pagana’s filings →

More from the funding graph