Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John & Ann Barney Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$269kPhilanthropy$229kEmployment$103kHealth$65kYouth Development$55kReligion$55kInternational$26kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES$55,400
CROSSROADS YMCA$50,000
FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$27,329
CITY OF CROWN POINT$15,000
CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$11,500
LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS$10,000
FLORIDA FAIRTAX EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC$7,000
DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION$5,000
COMMUNITY HELP NETWORK$4,899
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BONITA SPRINGS$2,000
MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$2,000
HEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC$2,000
CRISIS CENTER INC$1,500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY INDIANA CHAPTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHELTERED 91 INC: $20k → 15%CROSSROADS YMCA: $50k → 15%CROSSROADS YMCA: $50k → 15%CROSSROADS YMCA: $50k → 15%CROSSROADS YMCA: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY HELP NETWORK: $5k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $2k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $2k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
OH
CA
VA
AZ
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$594k · 22 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$594k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
0%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    CROSSROADS YMCA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +17%
  • OE
    OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +42%
  • FH
    FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $52k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • SI
    SHELTERED91 INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • LA
    LAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -30%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
4
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
5
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
6
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Lafayette General Health System Inc

The organization was organized for the benefit and support of its related 501(c)(3) health care entities which provide medical care to restore, maintain and improve the health of the community in which it serves.

Health
9
Lafayette General Medical Center Inc

To restore, maintain, and imprive health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartfire Missions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Florida Fair Tax Educational Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $219,000 · PhilanthropyCROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION I…FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $52,329 · PhilanthropyFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCCROSSROADS YMCA INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS YMCA INCSHELTERED91 INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERED91 INC+2 more: $11,899 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST INDIANA: $45,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST …FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $26,500 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NW IN: $25,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NW INDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION: $25,000 · OtherDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOP…CITY OF CROWN POINT: $15,000 · OtherCITY OF CROWN POINTFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BONITA SPRINGS: $12,000 · OtherLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC: $10,000 · OtherVALPARAISO PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CARMELITE HOME FOR GIRLS: $10,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $57,500 · Other+12 moreOPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC: $103,400 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY E…Indiana University Foundation: $13,500 · EducationMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $15,000 · InternationalFlorida Fair Tax Educational Association Inc: $13,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$271,329Human Services$231,899Other$246,000Employment$103,400Education$17,500International$15,000Civil Rights$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $219,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCROSSROADS YMCA INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC: $103,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $52,329 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERED91 INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVALPARAISO PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP NETWORK INC: $4,899 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERED91 INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Florida Fair Tax Educational Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds VALPARAISO PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HELP NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John W Anderson FoundationIN28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John W Anderson Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Crown Point Community Foundation Inc · Legacy Foundation Inc · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · Fulk Family Foundation Inc · Sourlis Irrevocable Charitable Trust · Dean & Barbara White Family Foundation Inc · Lake Area United Way Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · United Charitable · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John & Ann Barney Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John & Ann Barney Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Ann Barney Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph