Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Joe Murrill Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$708kEducation$276kMembership Benefit$35kInternational$23kCommunity Improvement$5kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$3kHealth$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VAIL CHURCH$50,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
MINISTRY OF UNIFICATION$25,000
LEVANTA MINISTRIES$25,000
PARACLETE MISSION GROUP INC$20,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
EDUTEK GLOBAL$5,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%AMERSON MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%LINKS PLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 19%FIRST LIBERTY CHURCH: $2k → 5%CHRIST OF THE HILLS CHURCH: $25k → 7%LEVANTA MINISTRIES: $25k → 8%PRESLEY SMITH: $30k → 10%LEVANTA MINISTRIES: $50k → 10%MAKARIOS: $2k → 10%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH: $25k → 11%SCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $49k → 11%CHRIST CHURCH PRESBYTERIAN: $1k → 13%GRACE CHURCH: $12k → 16%MINISTRY OF UNIFICATION: $25k → 12%THE VAIL CHURCH: $125k → 7%SERVANTS OF CHRIST INTERNATIONAL IN: $12k → 9%HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%CHRIST OF THE HILLS CHURCH: $20k → 7%CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 10%LEVANTA MINISTRIES: $25k → 10%MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $4k → 11%SCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $33k → 11%THE VAIL CHURCH: $101k → 7%SERVANTS OF CHRIST INTERNATIONAL IN: $5k → 9%LEVANTA MINISTRIES: $20k → 10%SCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSH: $31k → 11%GRACE CHURCH: $12k → 16%THE VAIL CHURCH: $80k → 7%LEVANTA MINISTRIES: $10k → 10%SCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSH: $26k → 11%MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $10k → 16%THE VAIL CHURCH: $50k → 7%LORENA: $10k → 10%MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 11%MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 16%THE VAIL CHURCH: $25k → 7%COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS: $40k → 16%THE VAIL CHURCH: $21k → 7%ALLEGRO: $35k → 16%EDUTEK GLOBAL: $10k → 7%ARROW CHILD FAMILY MINISTRIES: $3k → 16%KENDELLE SMITHMURRILL SCHOLARSHIP: $8k → 7%EDUTEK GLOBAL: $5k → 7%ALPHA HOUSTON: $5k → 16%EDUTEK GLOBAL: $5k → 7%SAN FRANCISCO NATIVITY ACADEMY: $5k → 16%LORENA MARTINEZ: $16k → 7%4 EAGLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Joe Murrill Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Joe Murrill Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$786k · 11 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
19

Total granted

$786k
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+30%

Still filing today

45%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalEducationMembership BenefitRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    Servants of Christ International
    2× · 2018–2019 · $17k · revenue +160%
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +125%
  • LP
    Links Players International Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +264%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • A
    Allegro
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • GC
    GRACE COVENANT CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Link Partners

We seek to advance the kingdom of God. Whether it be in North America, Central and South America or Africa and Asia Pacific. Global Link Partners is training and equipping the Church to reach the world with the Good News of Jesus Christ.…

Religion
2
Equippers Group International

To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.

Religion
3
King Ministries International

To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ

Religion
4
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
5
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
6
CrossTalk Global

CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…

Religion
7
Up Global Inc

UP Global exists to make Jesus known where He is not yet known. We provide pathways of engagement to the unreached and unengaged people in the world.

International
8
Samaritan Servants International

Samaritan servants international endeavors to rescue people as jesus mandated in luke 10 by ministering to people in destitute countries that have both physical and other needs for survival by offering food,water, shelter and hope through…

International
9
Discipleship Global Inc

Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.

10
Latin Equip Inc

Latin Equip's mission is to reach out to Latin America with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This is accomplished through pastoral and leadership training, establishment and constructions of churches, orphanages and similar outreaches,…

11
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
12
World Link Ministries Inc

World link ministries exists to serve as an "evangelistic force" by equipping and mobilizing teams of local evangelists and church planters who are effective in establishing, sustaining, and reproducing the body of christ in those parts of…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Servants of Christ International and the most unlike its peers is Allegro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VAIL BIBLE CHURCH — $402,000 · OtherVAIL BIBLE CHURCHSCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSHIP — $82,000 · OtherSCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSHIPSCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSH — $56,500 · OtherSCHULENBURG ISD - MURRILL SCHOLARSHCHRIST OF THE HILLS CHURCH — $45,000 · OtherCHRIST OF THE HILLS CHURCHCOLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · Other+19 more — $181,550 · Other+19 moreLEVANTA MINISTRIES — $130,000 · ReligionLEVANTA MINISTRI…THE MINISTRY OF UNIFICATION INC DBA SF — $25,000 · ReligionTHE MINISTRY OF …+3 more — $2,800 · ReligionAllegro — $35,000 · Membership BenefitEduTek Global — $20,000 · EducationSan Francisco Nativity Academy — $5,000 · EducationHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $4,000 · InternationalMAKARIOS — $2,000 · InternationalThe 4 Eagle Foundation — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$837,050Religion$157,800Membership Benefit$35,000Education$25,000International$6,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEVANTA MINISTRIES — $130,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetEduTek Global — $20,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetServants of Christ International — $17,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSan Francisco Nativity Academy — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe 4 Eagle Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLinks Players International Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPWORDS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEVANTA MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Allegro
  • Who funds THE MINISTRY OF UNIFICATION INC DBA SF
  • Who funds EduTek Global
  • Who funds Servants of Christ International
  • Who funds San Francisco Nativity Academy
  • Who funds The 4 Eagle Foundation
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Links Players International Inc
  • Who funds MAKARIOS
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds UPWORDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joe Murrill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph