Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joanna Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$57kAnimals$37kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kEnvironment$3kInternational$3kHealth$2kArts & Culture$650Other$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $38,601, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,601 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$790k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pat Floyd Ministries$15,000
Brighter Way Foundation$10,000
GBARK (Greyhound Boarding & Retirement Kamp)$4,000
Friends of Montgomery County Animals$2,000
Coastal Carolina Wildlife Rescue$1,000
Ocean Foundation (Shark Advocates International)$1,000
Bayside Service Dogs$1,000
Humane Society International$1,000
Port City Community Church$1,000
A Cat and Dog's Friend Rescue$500
Coastal Land Trust$500
Poplar Spring Animal Sanctuary$500
Greyhound Adoption League Texas (GALT)$301
Wesley Memorial United Methodist Church$300
Mercy Home for Boys & Girls$250
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 18 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
21

Total granted

$89k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-2%

Still filing today

44%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Friends of Montgomery County Animals Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +143%
  • RW
    RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +45%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals International
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AW
    ARCAS Wildlife Conservation Association
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • PP
    Paws Place Dog Rescue
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • LL
    LEAP - Lagunitas School District
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
3
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
4
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
5
Spring Farm Sanctuary
Animals
6
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
8
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
9
Help Animals India

Help Animals India is a 501c3 organization dedicated to improving the lives and welfare of animals by providing financial and consultation to support and build capacity of animal rescue groups in India and Nepal while connecting donors…

Animals
10
The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.

Animals
11
Awasa

Reduce animal euthanasia by providing free spay and neuters, free shots, pet food and public education

Animals
12
Animal Diplomacy

Supporting and assisting with rescue, sheltering, spay/neuter, and rehoming of cats and dogs in needy developing countries. Our current exclusive focus is on Egypt and the Egyptian Society for Mercy to Animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Poplar Spring Animal Sanctuary; the most unlike its peers is Stepping Forward Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pat Floyd Ministries: $30,000 · OtherPat Floyd MinistriesBRIGHTER WAY FOUNDATION: $16,500 · OtherBRIGHTER WAY FOUNDATIONChrist is the Answer Ministry: $5,500 · OtherChrist is the Answer MinistryGBARK (Greyhound Boarding & Retirement Kamp): $4,000 · OtherCoastal Carolina Wildlife Rescue: $3,300 · OtherOcean Foundation (Shark Advocates International): $3,000 · Other+29 more: $26,897 · Other+29 moreFriends of Montgomery County Animals Inc: $6,000 · AnimalsFriends of Mont…Wilmington Animal Centrix: $3,500 · AnimalsWilmington Anim…POPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,500 · AnimalsPOPLAR SPRING A…Humane World for Animals International: $2,000 · AnimalsHumane World fo…GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1,150 · AnimalsGREYHOUND FRIEN…+2 more: $700 · AnimalsRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING FORWARD MINISTRIES: $2,500 · InternationalElm School PTO: $1,000 · EducationDUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $500 · Arts & CultureWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $500 · Environment
Other$89,197Animals$15,850Human Services$4,000International$2,500Education$1,000Arts & Culture$500Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Montgomery County Animals Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPPING FORWARD MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPOPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1,150 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetElm School PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends of Montgomery County Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wilmington Animal Centrix ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING FORWARD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds POPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds Elm School PTO ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $43k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joanna’s filings →

More from the funding graph