Skip to content

North Carolina · Private foundation

The Joanna Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
17
Itemized grants FY2024
29
Organizations funded FY2023
45%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$39k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
26 to 29
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
8
Total assets, FY2024
$790k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 45% of the organizations The Joanna Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 60% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving17$39k47%
FY202329$39k45%
FY202226$36kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$57kAnimals$37kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kEnvironment$3kInternational$3kHealth$2kArts & Culture$650Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Brighter Way Foundation$16,5003n/a
Friends of Montgomery County Animals Inc$6,00024%
Red Wiggler Foundation Inc$4,00020%
Wilmington Animal Centrix$3,5002n/a
Port City Community Church$2,7503n/a
Stepping Forward Ministries$2,50020%
Poplar Spring Animal Sanctuary$2,50030%
Humane World for Animals International$2,00030%
Greyhound Friends of North Carolina Inc$1,15021%
Bayside Service Dogs$1,0001n/a
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of The Joanna Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Brighter Way Foundation$16,5003n/a
Friends of Montgomery County Animals Inc$6,00024%
Red Wiggler Foundation Inc$4,00020%
Wilmington Animal Centrix$3,5002n/a
Port City Community Church$2,7503n/a
Stepping Forward Ministries$2,50020%
Poplar Spring Animal Sanctuary$2,50030%
Humane World for Animals International$2,00030%
Greyhound Friends of North Carolina Inc$1,15021%
Bayside Service Dogs$1,0001n/a
Elm School PTO$1,00011%
Dupage Children's Museum$50010%
World Wildlife Fund Inc$50010%
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$50010%
Wesley Memorial United Methodist Church$3001n/a
Humane World for Animals Inc$20020%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 31 recipients with no EIN on record ($69k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Joanna Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Montgomery County Animals Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetRed Wiggler Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetStepping Forward Ministries: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPoplar Spring Animal Sanctuary: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreyhound Friends of North Carolina Inc: $1,150 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetElm School PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDupage Children's Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Joanna Foundation with peer funders

About The Joanna Foundation

How much does The Joanna Foundation give?
The Joanna Foundation reported 17 itemized grants totaling $38,601, out of $45,601 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 26 and 29 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does The Joanna Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (23%), Animals (15%), Human Services (2%).
Who are The Joanna Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Brighter Way Foundation ($17k), Friends of Montgomery County Animals Inc ($6k), Red Wiggler Foundation Inc ($4k).
Does The Joanna Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 45% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Joanna Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Joanna Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Network for Good, National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is The Joanna Foundation based?
The Joanna Foundation is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $43k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joanna’s filings →

More from the funding graph