How much does The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust give?

The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust reported 11 grants totaling $31,826 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 35 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (37%), Health (34%), Education (7%).

Who are The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Maltz Jupiter Theatre Inc ($84k), Temple Judea ($26k), Frenchmans Creek Charities Foundation Inc ($26k).

Does The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, National Philanthropic Trust, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.

Where is The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust based?

The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust is based in FL.

The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust

The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k

Granted FY2023

Grants FY2023

States reached

$15k

Largest

01What it funds

0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$161kHealth$151kEducation$32kReligion$30kPhilanthropy$29kInternational$9kHuman Services$8kCivil Rights$6kOther$0

02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k9 grants · $7k
$10k–50k2 grants · $25k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE & N FL	$15,000
FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION	$10,000
TEMPLE JUDEA	$2,310
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL	$1,296
MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH	$1,000
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATION	$1,000
SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE	$500
Individual grant recipient	$350
FURRY FRIENDS ADOPTION CLINIC & RESEARCH	$250
SOUTH FLORIDA PBS	$100
PBCCFF	$20

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$372k · 34 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$372k

$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+38%

Still filing today

62%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MJ
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC
5× · 2017–2022 · $84k · revenue +71%
FC
FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
5× · 2017–2023 · $26k · revenue +119%
NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
4× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +101%

Funded once

MS
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +38%
NT
NY TIMES NEEDIEST CASES
one grant, 2018 · $10k
TG
THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +56%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education

Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services

Institute for Applied Gerontology

The mjhs institute for innovation in palliative care is a not-for-profit organization. the institute is dedicated to promoting access to evidence-based, specialist-level palliative care for patients and families coping with serious or…

Human Services

University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Flying Manes Therapeutic Riding Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

42/43

Grantees still filing

35/43

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$186,497Arts & Culture$138,510Health$45,846Human Services$32,100Philanthropy$26,500International$9,000Civil Rights$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Joan B and Richard L Barovick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home