· Public charity
The Joan and Harold Feinbloom Supporting Foundation Inc
To support the charitable efforts of rochester area community foundation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $282k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA INC | $20,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES | $20,000 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR SUNY GENESEO | $20,000 |
| ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA | $20,000 |
| ROCHESTER HEARING & SPEECH CENTER | $20,000 |
| GARTH FAGAN DANCE INC | $15,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER ROCHESTER | $15,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES NEW YORK | $15,000 |
| PUSH PHYSICAL THEATRE INC | $15,000 |
| ENCOMPASS RESOURCES FOR LEARNING | $15,000 |
| GREATER ROCHESTER SUMMER LEARNING ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| CENTER FOR TEEN EMPOWERMENT | $15,000 |
| ST PETER'S COMMUNITY ARTS ACADEMY | $13,650 |
| FLOWER CITY ARTS CENTER INC | $12,000 |
| SPIRITUS CHRISTI PRISON OUTREACH | $11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCThe Children's Agenda Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $105k · revenue +27%
- TRThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York4× · 2019–2023 · $88k · revenue +55%
Hearing and Speech Center of Rochester Inc4× · 2019–2023 · $70k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- WCWilson Commencement Parkone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -5%
Rochester Institute of Technologygraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +38%- RCROCHESTER CITY BALLET INCone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.
Rochester Ecology Partners helps all people find nature where they live, work, and play.
The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…
Through supportive friendships, enhance the wellness of those with social and emotional barriers.
Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.
The rochesterworks system stimulates local economic growth by providing outstanding employment education, support, and training services.
Provide a safe, caring, and dynamic environment to help nurture the development of pre-school aged children.
We inspire, connect, and educate a vibrant, diverse network of individuals who will provide leadership to transform and strengthen our Greater Rochester Region.
Partnering with parents to develop a child's head, heart and hands for Jesus Christ through God's Word and academic excellence.
The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.
The mission of the Rochester Academy Charter School (RACS) is to provide students with rigorous, challenging academics through hands-on, meaningful learning opportunities that will provide students with the skills necessary to be…
To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester Area Community Foundation Initiatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Gardenaerial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Children's Agenda Inc ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds Hearing and Speech Center of Rochester Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR YOUTH INC DBA BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER ROCH ↗
- Who funds GEVA THEATRE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR TEEN EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR ONTARIO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Flower City Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends and Foundation of the Rochester Public Library ↗
- Who funds GARTH FAGAN DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368) ↗
- Who funds ALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Greater Rochester Summer Learning Association Inc ↗
- Who funds The Center for Youth Services Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATION OF LIFE COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds SPIRITUS CHRISTI PRISON OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Push Physical Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HARLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDENAERIAL INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds A MAGICAL JOURNEY THRU STAGES INC ↗
- Who funds STARBRIDGE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Wilson Commencement Park ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASS RESOURCES FOR LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds WRITERS & BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds MK Gandhi Institute For Nonviolence ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S COLLEGE PREP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL VISION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMERON COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · The Florence M Muller Foundation · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · The Guido and Ellen Palma Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Joan and Harold Feinbloom Supporting Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Teen Empowerment Inc — 7% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Joan and Harold Feinbloom Supporting Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Joan and Harold Feinbloom Supporting Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.