How much does The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation give?

The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $86,800 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 17 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (73%), Education (12%), Human Services (5%).

Who are The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Briarlake Baptist Church Inc ($527k), Canopy Life International Inc ($75k), The Salvation Army ($19k).

Does The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.

Where is The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation based?

The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation is based in GA.

The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation

The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$73k

Largest

01What it funds

0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$530kEducation$86kHuman Services$39kHealth$35kInternational$29kArts & Culture$2kAnimals$1kFood & Nutrition$200Other$0

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $4k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$50k–250k1 grant · $73k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$191k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BRIARLAKE BAPTIST CHURCH	$72,700
CANOPY LIFE INTERNATIONAL	$10,000
SALVATION ARMY	$1,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA	$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR	$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES	$500
CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL	$500
SAMARITANS PURSE	$100

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$722k · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$722k

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%

+1%

Still filing today

67%

56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalReligionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CL
Canopy Life International Inc
6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +63%
FF
Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
6× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +40%
NG
NORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
2× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +20%

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2023 · $5k
MH
MOUNT HOREB UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
one grant, 2021 · $1k
TA
THE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION
one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -3%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health

Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health

Wellstar Mcg Health Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.

—

Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech

Wellstar Sylvan Grove Hospital

Health

Au Medical Center Inc

Education

Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

15/20

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$596,045Education$86,550Human Services$16,850Health$14,600International$9,368Religion$3,200Arts & Culture$1,716Animals$1,020

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jim & Marlene Greene Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Jim & Marlene Greene’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home