Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jessica Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$387k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.7MEducation$362kPhilanthropy$268kHealth$110kReligion$91kInternational$90kCivil Rights$58kHuman Services$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$90,000
CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN$80,000
CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC$35,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC$24,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC$20,000
THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAYHOUSE$12,000
STANDWITHUS$11,120
Individual grant recipient$10,675
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO$10,000
INSTITUTE FOR MUSIC AND NEROLOGIC FUNCTION$10,000
MAMAN NONPROFIT$10,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$10,000
TEMPLE SHALOM$8,990
JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$8,000
IMPACT FORUM FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARA LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC: $3k → 16%PARA LOS NINOS: $1k → 14%SPECIAL NEEDS NETWORK: $1k → 14%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $600 → 12%THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $750 → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $2k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $1k → 14%ALMOST HOME KIDS: $2k → 14%ALMOST HOME KIDS: $500 → 14%ALMOST HOME KIDS: $500 → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $5k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $10k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
DC
MS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 42 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
49

Total granted

$2.3M
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+37%

Still filing today

71%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $793k · revenue +35%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $707k · revenue +0%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • NR
    NEW ROADS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
3
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
4
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
10
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
11
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
12
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Parker Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/77
Grantees still filing
51/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $793,175 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INCMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $707,218 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART+15 more: $122,405 · Arts & Culture+15 moreCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $259,600 · OtherCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOME…Individual grant recipient: $65,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOODMAN THEATRE GROUP: $53,500 · OtherGOODMAN THEATRE GROUPCHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM: $28,810 · Other+46 more: $287,845 · Other+46 moreBARNARD COLLEGE: $105,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLE…THE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $56,500 · EducationTHE BREARLEY …UCLA FOUNDATION: $37,358 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATI…Francis W Parker School: $36,500 · EducationFrancis W Par…Trustees of Dartmouth College: $25,000 · EducationTrustees of D…BRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $22,500 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCH…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $14,000 · EducationErikson Institute: $12,750 · EducationPROJECT ZAWADI INC: $12,500 · EducationNEW ROADS SCHOOL: $12,000 · Education+4 more: $17,300 · EducationHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $27,500 · InternationalMaman Nonprofit: $22,500 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $21,120 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $5,000 · International+2 more: $1,750 · InternationalMITZVAH MATTERS: $41,500 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $5,500 · Human ServicesCenter on Halsted: $5,000 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOS: $4,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesAlmost Home Kids: $3,000 · Human ServicesJewish Child and Family Services: $2,000 · Human Services+4 more: $3,350 · Human ServicesTHE PARKER FUND: $9,000 · HealthIMERMAN ANGELS: $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · HealthPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $500 · Health
Arts & Culture$1,622,798Other$695,655Education$351,408International$77,870Religion$42,000Human Services$35,850Health$26,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $793,175 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $707,218 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $259,600 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $105,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $56,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMITZVAH MATTERS: $41,500 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $37,358 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $36,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaman Nonprofit: $22,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PLAYHOUSE INC: $21,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $21,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetErikson Institute: $12,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ZAWADI INC: $12,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNEW ROADS SCHOOL: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARKER FUND: $9,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetJUSTICE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLFORWARD: $5,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLEAGUE OF CHICAGO THEATRES: $5,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter on Halsted: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAlmost Home Kids: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,605 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT PROMISES FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWE THE PROTESTERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLife Sail Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeason of Concern: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICING SMILES Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BREARLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MITZVAH MATTERS ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Maman Nonprofit ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Erikson Institute ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ZAWADI INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ROADS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR MUSIC AND NEUROLOGICAL FUNCTION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Vocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PARKER FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA17.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Annenberg Foundation · John H Hart Foundation · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jessica Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jessica Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jessica Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Jessica Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jessica’s filings →

More from the funding graph