Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Jerusalem Fund Inc

The organization was established to spread judaism and jewish identity by operating and supporting outreach organizations in the u.s.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$8.8MHuman Services$1.0MCivil Rights$629kInternational$177kArts & Culture$13k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VAAD LEORER YESHAINIM$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $640k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HACHESHBONE: $5k → 14%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $500k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $100k → 11%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $35k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 8 repeat orgs$5.8M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$4.8M
$5.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+31%

Still filing today

38%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BETH ABA TRUST
    5× · 2019–2024 · $838k · revenue +27% · 45% of their budget
  • HF
    HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED
    3× · 2017–2019 · $629k · revenue +5%
  • AY
    AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $535k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • YA
    YESHIVAT AISH HATORAHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4.5M · revenue ×24
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $400k · revenue +3%
  • AG
    AISH GLOBAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $390k · revenue +157%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
2
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
3
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
4
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
5
American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc

To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.

Education
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
8
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
9
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
12
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amatz Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr19%46%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr11%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr19%57%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr11%8%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/23
the rest of the field
14%
12,421/91,962

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH — $4,489,204 · EducationYESHIVAT AISH HATORAHHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED — $629,000 · EducationHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATEDVAAD LEORER YESHAINIM MIGDAL OR — $1,323,800 · OtherVAAD LEORER YESHAINIM MIGDAL O…YESHIVA KEREN ORAH — $815,000 · OtherYESHIVA KEREN ORAHAISH CENTER INC — $476,333 · OtherAISH CENTER INCALUMNI OF THE RABBINICAL COLLEGE KNESSETH ISRAEL OF SLABODKA KOWNA — $161,641 · OtherALUMNI OF THE RABBINICAL COLLE…+4 more — $134,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC — $400,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FR…AISH GLOBAL INC — $390,000 · ReligionAISH GLOBAL…PROJECT INSPIRE INC — $213,000 · ReligionPROJECT INS…JFT - JEWISH FUTURES FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 · Religion+1 more — $5,000 · ReligionBETH ABA TRUST — $837,554 · PhilanthropyBETH ABA …Amatz Initiative — $50,000 · PhilanthropyAmatz Ini…+1 more — $30,000 · PhilanthropyAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC — $535,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — $100,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesLEV MODIIN — $12,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $12,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$5,118,204Other$2,911,274Religion$1,045,500Philanthropy$917,554Human Services$640,000International$12,500Arts & Culture$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETH ABA TRUST — $837,554 over 5y, 45% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED — $629,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC — $535,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC — $390,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC — $213,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetALUMNI OF THE RABBINICAL COLLEGE KNESSETH ISRAEL OF SLABODKA KOWNA — $161,641 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmatz Initiative — $50,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetJFT - JEWISH FUTURES FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLEV MODIIN — $12,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM KOLLEL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY29.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ojc Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Fjc · Shorelawn Fund · Ays Tzedakah Foundation · Mayberg Foundation Inc · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jerusalem Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jerusalem Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Jerusalem Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph