Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jeffrey P Reich Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$135kEducation$76kReligion$16kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$5kPhilanthropy$4kInternational$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
HACKLEY SCHOOL$5,000
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL$5,000
NANTUCKET ARTIST ASSOCIATION$5,000
PLAY FOR PINK BREAST CANCER$1,000
ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION$1,000
NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ALEXANDRA'S PLAYGROUND: $500 → 9%ALEXANDRA'S PLAYGROUND: $250 → 9%ALEXANDRA'S PLAYGROUND: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
OH
CT
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$204k · 13 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$204k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+35%

Still filing today

62%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationCivil RightsHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $75k · revenue +15%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $34k · revenue +51%
  • HS
    HACKLEY SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $32k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • NO
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TF
    TD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • LC
    LINDNER CENTER FOR HOPE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Waldorf School Inc

The waldorf school of lexington nurtures each child's curiosity, ingenuity, and love of learning so that they can meet the future with wonder, confidence, and resilience.

Education
2
Buckley Country Day School

The school's mission is grounded in the belief expressed by b. lord buckley that opening the eyes and awakening the mind is the essence of education. guided by that mission for almost a century, buckley has purposely focused on developing…

Education
3
Windward School

Windward school is a dynamic college-preparatory school that challenges each student to achieve excellence in a nurturing, inclusive community. windward teachers, parents, and administrators work together to inspire our students to be…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
West Nottingham Academy

To inspire and educate students to become socially aware leaders and innovators who positively impact their communities around the world

Education
6
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
7
The Wilson School

To prepare students for success in an ever-changing world, our exceptional educators embrace classic and innovative methods within a nurturing, inclusive, and collaborative environment. our mission is to provide them with an excellent…

Education
8
King School Inc

King school prepares students to thrive in a rapidly changing world. our students are immersed in an engaging and innovative curriculum anchored in an inquiry-based approach that fosters curiosity, intellectual growth, and character…

Education
9
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Futures in Education; the most unlike its peers is The Windham Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NANTUCKET HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,500 · OtherNANTUCKET HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY: $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITYIRVINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherIRVINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHNANTUCKET ARTIST ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherNANTUCKET ARTIST ASSOCIATIONPLAY FOR PINK BREAST CANCER: $3,500 · Other+9 more: $6,500 · Other+9 moreNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY: $75,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILIT…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $33,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF WESTMINS…FUTURES IN EDUCATION: $4,500 · EducationFUTURES IN EDUCATION+1 more: $1,250 · EducationHACKLEY SCHOOL: $32,000 · HealthHACKLEY SCHOOLADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsALEXANDRA'S PLAYGROUND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$86,000Civil Rights$75,000Education$44,250Health$32,000Recreation & Sports$4,000Human Services$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $33,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHACKLEY SCHOOL: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURES IN EDUCATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WINDHAM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSING THRESHOLDS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALEXANDRA'S PLAYGROUND INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Thursday Club: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HACKLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WINDHAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSING THRESHOLDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRA'S PLAYGROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Thursday Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jeffrey P Reich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jeffrey P Reich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Windham Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $109k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jeffrey P Reich Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph