· Private foundation
The Jeffrey H and Shari L Aronson Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of The Jeffrey H and Shari L Aronson Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $2,363,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,819,739 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,456,639 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k31 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Footsteps Inc | $150,000 |
| Bnai Brith Hillel Foundation At Queens College | $125,000 |
| The Baruch College Fund | $125,000 |
| Boundless Israel Inc | $100,000 |
| Hunter College Hillel | $100,000 |
| La'aretz Shulamit Sheli Harel | $100,000 |
| New Yorkers for a Better Future | $100,000 |
| Jewish Food Society Inc | $100,000 |
| Research Foundation of the City University of New York | $100,000 |
| The Fund for Public Schools Inc | $75,000 |
| FJC | $75,000 |
| New Jersey Federation of Young Mens Hebrew Association & Young Womens Hebrew Association | $75,000 |
| Per Scholas Inc | $75,000 |
| 4G44 Esports Inc | $75,000 |
| National Jewish Advocacy Center | $75,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER3× · 2020–2023 · $606k · revenue +36%
- RFResearch Foundation of the City University of New York3× · 2022–2024 · $511k · revenue +29%
- FIFOOTSTEPS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $450k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- TJTHE JEWISH MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +50%
- JHJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MDone grant, 2022 · $839k
- AJAmerican Jewish Committee, NY, NY, New York, NYone grant, 2022 · $381k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Expanded Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Talmar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
- Who funds FOOTSTEPS INC ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUNTER HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT QUEENS COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FOOD SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds BOUNDLESS ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JOHN JAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Nash Family Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Lisa & Michael Leffell Foundation · The Heckscher Foundation for Children
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jeffrey H and Shari L Aronson Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Jeffrey H and Shari L Aronson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.