Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jeff & Lora Carter Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$161
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$161
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$32kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$600Religion$500Education$300Human Services$200Housing & Shelter$100Other$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$161
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHRYSALIS HOUSE$161
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $500 → 15%LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $200 → 15%LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $100 → 15%LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$90k · 7 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$90k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+38%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LEXARTS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +25%
  • LM
    LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +187%
  • CH
    CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $1k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • LV
    LEXINGTON VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
    one grant, 2021 · $250
  • SF
    SMITHLAND FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior League of Lexington Inc

The Junior League of Lexington is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training. The League's purpose is exclusively…

Community Improvement
2
The Lexington Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Lexington Community Radio Inc

RADIOLEX provides multiple media platforms to amplify underrepresented local voices and promote an equitable, inclusive community while nurturing an informed and safe Lexington.

Community Improvement
4
Commerce Lexington Foundation Inc

The mission of the commerce lexington foundation is to be a catalyst for positive impact on talent, quality of life and economic well-being for the citizens of the greater lexington region, by enabling commerce lexington to expand its…

Community Improvement
5
Kentucky Foundation for Women Inc
6
Lewistown Art Center

Art appreciation for fergus county and the surrounding area.

Arts & Culture
7
Art League of Henderson County Inc

To foster, encourage, and develop popular public appreciation of all forms of the visual arts, through sponsoring speakers, classes and exhibits, and to operate a facility where artists may avail themselves of the study of the visual arts

8
Lexington Clinic Foundation for Medical Education and Research Inc
Education
9
Kristin S Conrad Lace Center Foundation

Lace center and Museum for exhibitions, beginners education, continuing education with study library

Arts & Culture
10
Lucas Museum of Narrative Art
Arts & Culture
11
Friends of Kentucky Theatre

The Kentucky Theatre is a historic building in downtown Lexington, KY, that had fallen into disuse and disrepair. Purchased by the City of Lexington, The Friends of the Kentucky Theatre Inc is a nonprofit tasked with overseeing the…

Philanthropy
12
Lexington Public Library

Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lexarts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $51,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,780 · Other+13 more — $3,200 · Other+13 moreLEXINGTON ART LEAGUE INC — $24,000 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON ART LEAGUE INCLEXARTS INC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureLEXARTS INC+1 more — $200 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $1,900 · Human ServicesCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $1,361 · HealthKENDYL AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $100 · HealthLord's Legacy Life Ministries — $100 · Housing & Shelter100 WOMEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100 · PhilanthropyJESSAMINE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $100 · Education
Other$57,080Arts & Culture$32,200Human Services$1,900Health$1,461Housing & Shelter$100Philanthropy$100Education$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEXINGTON ART LEAGUE INC — $24,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLEXARTS INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $1,361 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget100 WOMEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKENDYL AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEXINGTON ART LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds LEXARTS INC
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds Lord's Legacy Life Ministries
  • Who funds 100 WOMEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KENDYL AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JESSAMINE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jeff & Lora Carter Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph