Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$2.0MCivil Rights$775kYouth Development$510kReligion$500kInternational$435kHealth$200kPublic Benefit$138kPhilanthropy$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $960k
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY$100,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC$100,000
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION$100,000
THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL$80,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$70,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION$60,000
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND INC$50,000
VISION TO LEARN$50,000
POINT FOUNDATION$50,000
HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND$50,000
INNOVATION AFRICA$50,000
GIRLS WITH IMPACT$50,000
NATIVE RENEWABLES INC$50,000
EDINBORO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $50k → 16%Unitarian Universalist Association: $100k → 16%Edinboro University Foundation: $88k → 15%SEE ATTACHED STATEMENT: $622k → 22%Focusing Philanthropy Inc: $50k → 14%INNOVATION AFRICA: $50k → 9%The Brotherhood Sister Sol: $100k → 17%Thurgood Marshall College Fund Inc: $50k → 14%Girls With Impact: $50k → 9%American Indian College Fund: $70k → 10%World Bicycle Relief: $75k → 14%American Civil Liberties Union of: $60k → 16%Unitarian Universalist Association: $100k → 16%Edinboro University Foundation: $80k → 15%Hispanic Scholarship Fund: $50k → 14%The Brotherhood Sister Sol: $100k → 17%Thurgood Marshall College Fund Inc: $50k → 14%GIRLS WITH IMPACT: $50k → 9%American Indian College Fund: $70k → 10%World Bicycle Relief: $50k → 14%American Civil Liberties Union of: $60k → 16%Unitarian Universalist Association: $100k → 16%Edinboro University Foundation: $52k → 15%Vision to Learn: $50k → 14%The Brotherhood Sister Sol: $100k → 17%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND INC: $50k → 14%American Indian College Fund: $70k → 10%WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF: $50k → 14%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION: $60k → 16%Unitarian Universalist Association: $100k → 16%Edinboro University Foundation: $51k → 15%Hispanic Scholarship Fund: $50k → 14%The Brotherhood Sister Sol: $100k → 17%Thurgood Marshall College Fund Inc: $50k → 14%AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $70k → 10%American Civil Liberties Union of: $60k → 16%UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION: $100k → 16%THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL: $80k → 17%GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $100k → 17%George Jackson Academy: $100k → 17%George Jackson Academy: $90k → 17%George Jackson Academy: $90k → 17%George Jackson Academy: $75k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union: $100k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union: $100k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union: $100k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 14 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$4.0M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $480k · revenue +3%
  • AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $330k · revenue +11%
  • WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • FP
    FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • TA
    Take A Leap Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
8
Arcadia University

Arcadia university's pioneering, global, integrated, liberal arts, and professional learning experience cultivates leaders who are intellectually fearless and uniquely prepared for life and work. our highly regarded, values-based learning…

Education
9
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
10
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Alliant Educational Foundation

The alliant educational foundation builds bridges between under-resourced communities, universities, and other organizations to create a more equitable, healthy, and just society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Indian College Fund; the most unlike its peers is World Bicycle Relief Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $455,000 · EducationGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMYAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $330,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUNDEDINBORO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $321,164 · EducationEDINBORO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONThurgood Marshall College Fund: $250,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College FundPOINT FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationPOINT FOUNDATIONHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $250,000 · EducationHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUNDGirls With Impact Inc: $175,000 · EducationGirls With Impact IncICIVICS INC: $137,500 · EducationICIVICS INCRAZIAS RAY OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $110,000 · EducationUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION: $500,000 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST A…American Civil Liberties Union: $400,000 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties…NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $50,000 · OtherINNOVATION AFRICA: $50,000 · Other+1 more: $30,000 · OtherTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $480,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROTHER…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $215,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION - NJ FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $275,000 · Public Safety & DisasterVISION TO LEARN: $200,000 · HealthFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Education$2,278,664Other$1,030,000Youth Development$480,000Civil Rights$375,000Public Safety & Disaster$275,000Health$200,000Philanthropy$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $480,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $455,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $330,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEDINBORO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $321,164 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $275,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $215,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $200,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGirls With Impact Inc: $175,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetICIVICS INC: $137,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRAZIAS RAY OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION - NJ FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jcdrp Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jcdrp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph