Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Janet and Monte Klein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$31kArts & Culture$17kHealth$15kYouth Development$11kHuman Services$8kEnvironment$6kReligion$5kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
8
States reached
$572k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MISC ORG CHARITIES$2,457
KIDS AND HORSES INC$1,500
EDDY HOUSE$1,500
YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY$1,000
RENO PHILHARMONIC$1,000
STETSON COLLEGE OF LAW$350
ORCHARD AFRICA$350
Individual grant recipient$350
FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE$300
AMERICA RED CROSS$300
SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES$300
JEWISH NEVADA$250
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$250
AMERICAN CANCER$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES: $300 → 11%SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES: $300 → 11%SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES: $250 → 11%SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES: $250 → 11%SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES: $200 → 11%EDDY HOUSE: $4k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $2k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $2k → 10%THE CHILDRENS CABINET: $1k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $1k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $1k → 10%THE CHILDRENS CABINET: $300 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
CT
CA
MD
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 27 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
12

Total granted

$109k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+32%

Still filing today

37%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $825 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    RENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +28%
  • KA
    KIDS AND HORSES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +40%
  • EH
    EDDY HOUSE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +336%

Funded once

  • HI
    HEBREW IMMIGRANT SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT COMM
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County

A community where no one should feel the hurt of hunger. Interfaith Food Ministry feeds the hungry and works to reduce food insecurity in Nevada County. We help to sustain health, human dignity and the opportunity for individuals to…

Food & Nutrition
6
Jewish Federation of Omaha Inc

To build and sustain a strong and vibrant omaha jewish community and to support jews in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
7
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
9
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Nevada Public Radio

Nevada public radio will enhance the quality of life and foster civic engagement by informing, education and inspiring our growing audiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Florida Southern College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISC ORG CHARITIES: $21,985 · OtherMISC ORG CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient: $7,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRUCKEETAHOE FOUNDATION: $5,604 · OtherTRUCKEETAHOE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $4,814 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKE TAHOE FUND: $3,029 · OtherHEBREW IMMIGRANT SOCIETY: $2,500 · OtherSTETSON COLLEGE OF LAW: $2,350 · Other+25 more: $18,505 · Other+25 moreKIDS AND HORSES INC: $12,765 · HealthKIDS AND HORSES …JEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $4,250 · HealthJEWISH HOME FOR …+1 more: $200 · HealthRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $14,436 · Arts & CultureRENO PHILHARM…+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureEDDY HOUSE: $8,500 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSETHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $1,320 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDR…SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE: $1,300 · Human ServicesSIERRA SEN…YOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $5,750 · Recreation & SportsFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $1,840 · EducationFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $1,040 · Food & NutritionHIAS INC: $1,030 · International
Other$66,387Health$17,215Arts & Culture$14,686Human Services$11,120Recreation & Sports$5,750Education$1,840Food & Nutrition$1,040International$1,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $14,436 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS AND HORSES INC: $12,765 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $5,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $4,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $1,840 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoe: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $1,320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE: $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $1,040 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORCHARD AFRICA: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetReno Chamber Orchestra Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AND HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoe ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARD AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds Reno Chamber Orchestra Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tahoe Community FoundationNV15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tahoe Community Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Janet and Monte Klein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Janet and Monte Klein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Southern College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Janet and Monte Klein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph