Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James & Veronica Chesterton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$71kHuman Services$51kEducation$33kArts & Culture$23kFood & Nutrition$13kInternational$13kEnvironment$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$431k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE IRELAND FUNDS$5,300
EN KA SOCIETY INC$3,000
SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION$2,000
MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR$2,000
LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL$2,000
LYRIC STAGE COMPANY OF BOSTON$2,000
IRISH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION (CHAPEL AND YORK)$1,000
ORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST$1,000
BABSON OLIN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$1,000
ENGLISH AT LARGE$1,000
BIRDSEY CAPE WILDLIFE CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $3k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $3k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $3k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $2k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $2k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $2k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $2k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $1k → 8%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $1k → 8%IRISH INTERNATIONAL IMMIGRATION CENTER: $3k → 16%IRISH INTERNATIONAL IMMIGRATION CENTER: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 19 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$195k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+119%

Still filing today

68%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +28%
  • EK
    EN KA SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +71%
  • LS
    Lyric Stage Company of Boston Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WH
    WINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • GH
    GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - HURRICAN HARVEY RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH MATTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brewster Conservation Trust

Land conservation

Environment
2
Women's Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

The women's foundation of massachusetts, inc. economically empowers women and girls in greater boston and across the commonwealth through creating and funding high impact leadership and economic programs in partnership with women's and…

Philanthropy
3
New England Legal Foundation

New england legal foundation (nelf) is the leading non-profit public interest law firm in the region addressing policy and constitutional concerns related to free enterprise. its mission is promoting public discourse on the proper role of…

Civil Rights
4
Massachusetts Council of Community Hospitals Inc

Support the advocacy of community hospitals.

Health
5
The Boston Foundation for Sight Inc

Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.

Human Services
6
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
7
Lowell Observatory Foundation

To sustain and enhance lowell observatory's mission of research and education by generating perpetual financial support.

Science & Tech
8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
Westport Land Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve and protect westport massachusetts natural resources for people and nature, and to educate the public about the wise use of natural resources.

Environment
10
Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives Inc

Massachusetts biomedical initiatives, inc. ("mbi or the organization") is a private non-profit corporation focusing on building up central massachusetts as a global biomanufacturing hub. our mission of being a partner for fostering…

Science & Tech
11
The New England Council Inc

To foster growth of the competitive enterprise system of business in new england; to develop and maintain comprehensive views of new england conditions and problems; to secure recognition of the commonality of economic interest specific to…

—
12
Walkboston Inc

Walkmassachusetts makes walking safer and easier in massachusetts to encourage better health, a cleaner environment and vibrant communities.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Boston Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Irish Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EN KA SOCIETY INC: $23,000 · OtherEN KA SOCIETY INCMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR: $19,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EARENGLISH AT LARGE INC: $10,250 · OtherENGLISH AT LARGE INCBABSON OLIN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $10,100 · OtherBABSON OLIN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH BURLINGTON: $9,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH BURLINGTONGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $8,500 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCDANA FARBER LUNG CANCER RESEARCH: $6,000 · OtherJOSLIN CENTER: $5,500 · OtherTHE IRELAND FUNDS: $5,300 · OtherThe Food Project Inc: $4,500 · Other+14 more: $20,750 · Other+14 moreNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC: $24,250 · HealthNATIONAL SCLER…WINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthWINCHESTER HOS…LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC: $17,500 · Human ServicesLOWER CAPE …RIAN IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRIAN IMMIGR…Lyric Stage Company of Boston Inc: $20,500 · Arts & CultureLyric Stag…UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON: $10,860 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,000 · InternationalIrish Educational Foundation Inc: $11,000 · PhilanthropyORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST: $5,205 · Environment
Other$121,900Health$29,250Human Services$22,500Arts & Culture$20,500International$12,860Philanthropy$11,000Environment$5,205

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC: $24,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEN KA SOCIETY INC: $23,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetLyric Stage Company of Boston Inc: $20,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC: $17,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetIrish Educational Foundation Inc: $11,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON: $10,860 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetENGLISH AT LARGE INC: $10,250 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST: $5,205 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRIAN IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Food Project Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL PARENT FACULTY ASSOCIATION: $500 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EN KA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Stage Company of Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC ↗
  • Who funds Irish Educational Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISH AT LARGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds RIAN IMMIGRANT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER HIGH SCHOOL PARENT FACULTY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James & Veronica Chesterton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James & Veronica Chesterton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • English at Large Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc: 6% of income from government
  • Orleans Conservation Trust: 2% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James & Veronica Chesterton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph