Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$112kReligion$105kEducation$87kPhilanthropy$39kInternational$25kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$654k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCY$63,128
CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA$25,000
Individual grant recipient$9,170
CONGREGATION BNAI EMUNAH$7,130
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HILLEL$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,100
FIRST SERVE TULSA FOUNDATION$5,000
PHILBROOK MUSEUM$2,000
SEEDLING FOUNDATION$1,080
BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION FOR EXC$1,000
GILCREASE MUSEUM$1,000
CHERRY STREET FARMERS' MARKET INC$500
TEMPLE ISRAEL$500
TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE$360
THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION$265
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Families Behind the Badge Childrens Fou: $37 → 7%THE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $107 → 22%Compass Family Services: $525 → 10%The Brigid Alliance: $250 → 17%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE: $360 → 15%Tulsa Debate League: $360 → 15%Family Chidren's Services: $36 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CA
TN
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 21 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
40

Total granted

$212k
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+44%

Still filing today

24%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    Congregation Bnai Emunah
    8× · 2017–2025 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2019–2025 · $37k
  • CITY YEAR INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCY
    one grant, 2024 · $110k
  • SF
    Stanford Fd for Undergraduate Educa
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • JG
    J Give - BeYachad for Israel
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Trellis Foundation

We believe every texas student deserves the opportunity to earn a postsecondary credential or degree that helps them achieve the future they envision for themselves and their families. we invest in the programs, practices, and policies…

Human Services
5
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
Brooklyn Community Foundation

Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.

Philanthropy
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Tulsa; the most unlike its peers is Flo & Morris Mizel Jewish Community Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCY: $110,006 · OtherALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCYALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCY: $63,128 · OtherALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCYCongregation Bnai Emunah: $60,474 · OtherCongregation Bnai EmunahIndividual grant recipient: $36,740 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY YEAR INC: $30,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCIndividual grant recipient: $25,370 · OtherIndividual grant recipientStanford Fd for Undergraduate Educa: $25,000 · OtherStanford Fd for Undergraduate EducaJ Give - BeYachad for Israel: $25,000 · OtherJ Give - BeYachad for IsraelUniversity of Oklahoma Hillel: $24,000 · OtherUniversity of Oklahoma Hillel+46 more: $41,763 · Other+46 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,660 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $10,360 · PhilanthropyBOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,300 · Philanthropy+2 more: $280 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,330 · EducationSEEDLING FOUNDATION: $1,080 · Education+3 more: $746 · EducationTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $25,000 · Human Services+6 more: $1,675 · Human ServicesFirst Serve Tulsa Foundation: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $1,180 · Housing & ShelterWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $100 · Housing & ShelterPRO PUBLICA INC: $518 · Arts & CultureTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $98 · Arts & CultureGREENWOOD RISING INC: $98 · Arts & Culture
Other$441,481Philanthropy$41,600Education$27,156Human Services$26,675Youth Development$5,000Housing & Shelter$1,280Arts & Culture$714

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY YEAR INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,660 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $10,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFirst Serve Tulsa Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDLING FOUNDATION: $1,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONARD HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC: $365 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETIC JUSTICE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD RISING INC: $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECCAS CLOSET INC: $66 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $37 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA ↗
  • Who funds First Serve Tulsa Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDLING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRY STREET FARMERS' MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds CONARD HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK21.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Zarrow Families Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Sharon Cash Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph