Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$112kReligion$105kEducation$87kPhilanthropy$39kInternational$25kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$862k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alliance for Medical Price Transpar$110,006
City Year Tulsa$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,870
University of Oklahoma Hillel$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Tulsa Community FDN$3,960
Booker T Washington Foundation for Exc$1,300
Philbrook Museaum of Art$1,000
Congregation Bnai Emunah$1,000
Sherwin Miller Museaum of Art$1,000
Temple Israel$500
Mizel Jewish Community Day School$500
Tulsa Debate League$360
Stanford University$330
Congregation Beth Elohim$257
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Families Behind the Badge Childrens Fou: $37 → 7%Compass Family Services: $525 → 10%The Brigid Alliance: $250 → 17%Tulsa Debate League: $360 → 15%Family Chidren's Services: $36 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
CA
TN
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$179k · 19 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
28

Total granted

$179k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+45%

Still filing today

16%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    Congregation Bnai Emunah
    7× · 2017–2024 · $53k
  • CITY YEAR INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2019–2024 · $28k

Funded once

  • SF
    Stanford Fd for Undergraduate Educa
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • JG
    J Give - BeYachad for Israel
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • BH
    BTW HS Foundation for Excellence
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
5
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

9
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Tulsa and the most unlike its peers is Flo & Morris Mizel Jewish Community Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAt-Risk Youth MentoringAffordable Housing Developm…Fallen First Responder Supp…Child and Family ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Developmental Disabilities …Jewish Community FederationsCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%7%<5yr13%10%5–10yr17%31%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr19%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%52%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%1%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr14%15%35–55yr19%6%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 52% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
2,509/19,390

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCY — $110,006 · OtherALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL PRICE TRANSPARENCYCongregation Bnai Emunah — $53,344 · OtherCongregation Bnai EmunahCITY YEAR INC — $30,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCIndividual grant recipient — $27,570 · OtherIndividual grant recipientStanford Fd for Undergraduate Educa — $25,000 · OtherStanford Fd for Undergraduate EducaJ Give - BeYachad for Israel — $25,000 · OtherJ Give - BeYachad for IsraelIndividual grant recipient — $20,270 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUniversity of Oklahoma Hillel — $18,000 · Other+39 more — $35,769 · Other+39 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $28,660 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMU…JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $10,360 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $2,300 · PhilanthropyBOOKER T WA…+1 more — $100 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,330 · Education+3 more — $746 · EducationCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $525 · Human ServicesTULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED — $360 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $250 · Human Services+2 more — $73 · Human ServicesTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $100 · Housing & ShelterPRO PUBLICA INC — $518 · Arts & CultureGREENWOOD RISING INC — $98 · Arts & CultureTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC — $365 · Recreation & Sports
Other$344,959Philanthropy$41,420Education$26,076Human Services$1,208Housing & Shelter$1,100Arts & Culture$616Recreation & Sports$365

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITY YEAR INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $28,660 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $10,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $2,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONARD HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC — $365 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETIC JUSTICE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD RISING INC — $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECCAS CLOSET INC — $66 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $37 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA
  • Who funds BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC
  • Who funds FLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds CONARD HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC
  • Who funds TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK21.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Zarrow Families Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The James and Sharon Cash Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph