Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jacobus Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$122kRecreation & Sports$64kYouth Development$45kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$25kAnimals$25kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Trans Miss Golf Association$5,000
Desert Mountain Foundation$5,000
MN Golf Foundation$5,000
Musical Instrument Museum$5,000
Desperados$5,000
College Golf Fellowship$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Liberty Classical Academy$5,000
USSGA Memorial Fund$5,000
Hope International$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Faith's Lodge: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$196k · 11 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

$196k
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+25%

Still filing today

55%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2025 · $35k
  • MI
    MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM
    4× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue -14%
  • MZ
    MN Zoo Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k

Funded once

  • KP
    KENT PLACE SCHOOLgraduated
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +26%
  • DT
    Desperados Trail Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • PZ
    Pheonix Zoo Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
College World Golf Championships Foundation Inc

Our mission is to preserve the integrity of college golf, recognizing that our student-athletes not only excel in the sport but also become significant contributors to society. by hosting exceptional ncaa di golf championships, we honor…

Recreation & Sports
2
Ladies Professional Golf Association

To promote worldwide interest in the game of women's professional golf. primary activities include sanctioning and administering golf tournaments and providing education and certification opportunities for individuals in the golf industry.

—
3
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
7
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
11
Executive Women's Golf Association Inc

To provide opportunities for women to learn, play and enjoy the game of golf through chapter activities, educational programs, golf and networking events, and leadership development.

Community Improvement
12
Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation Inc

The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcdowell Sonoran Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is The Lewin Fund to Fight Women's Cancers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMN Zoo Foundation: $25,000 · OtherMN Zoo FoundationMN Golf Foundation: $20,000 · OtherMN Golf FoundationDesperados Trail Fund: $10,000 · OtherDesperados Trail FundPheonix Zoo Foundation: $10,000 · OtherPheonix Zoo FoundationTrans Miss Golf Association: $10,000 · OtherTrans Miss Golf AssociationIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherGrace Church: $5,000 · OtherTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherRUSS LYON FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherCHILD LOSS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $9,600 · Other+6 moreKENT PLACE SCHOOL: $70,000 · EducationKENT PLACE SCHOOLDESERT MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationDESERT MOUNTAIN FOUNDATIONLIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationLIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMYABC TO CEO LTD: $5,000 · EducationMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDESPERADOS: $15,200 · EnvironmentMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $10,000 · AnimalsCollege Golf Fellowship: $10,000 · ReligionUSSGA MEMORIAL FUND INC: $6,000 · Employment
Other$144,600Education$120,000Arts & Culture$25,000Environment$20,200Animals$10,000Religion$10,000Employment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENT PLACE SCHOOL: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDESPERADOS: $15,200 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUSSGA MEMORIAL FUND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABC TO CEO LTD: $5,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetRUSS LYON FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCHILD LOSS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LEWIN FUND TO FIGHT WOMEN'S CANCERS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENT PLACE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DESERT MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DESPERADOS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds USSGA MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ABC TO CEO LTD ↗
  • Who funds RUSS LYON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE LEWIN FUND TO FIGHT WOMEN'S CANCERS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jacobus Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jacobus Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jacobus Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jacobus Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacobus Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph