Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jack Kagan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$310kHealth$282kHuman Services$255kArts & Culture$121kAnimals$72kYouth Development$71kPublic Benefit$52kEducation$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATIN$30,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
KILCHER LIVING HOMESTEAD MUSEUM$15,000
HEROS HEALING HOMESTEAD$15,000
NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
DEC MY ROOM$10,000
NEW MEXICO CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$10,000
YES INSTITUTE$10,000
SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION$5,500
CENTRAL FLORIDA DREAMPLEX$5,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$5,000
NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING$5,000
SANTA FE CHILDRENS MUSEUM$5,000
THE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%FREEDOM RIDE: $10k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $6k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $6k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 13%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 13%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $4k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
NY
OR
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
MD
AZ
NM
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 28 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
28

Total granted

$1.0M
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+14%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $145k · revenue +202%
  • NM
    New Mexico Childrens Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $103k · revenue +109%
  • US
    UNITED STATES SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $55k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • LF
    LA FAMILIA - NAMASTE
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • HT
    HORSES THAT HELP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
2
Make-a-Wish Foundation of San Diego

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Make-a-Wish Foundation of New Mexico

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses

—
5
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
6
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
7
Children's Cancer Fund of New Mexico

The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…

—
8
United States Sailing Association Inc

The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.

Recreation & Sports
9
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
10
National Ability Center

The national ability center (the center) empowers individuals with disabilities by building self-esteem, confidence and lifetime skills through sport, recreation and educational programs.

Recreation & Sports
11
Special Olympics Inc

Special olympics strives to create a better world by fostering the acceptance and inclusion of people of all abilities through sports, health and education programs.

Recreation & Sports
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Slb Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIVE HEART: $61,500 · OtherDIVE HEARTFAMILY OF FRIENDS: $60,000 · OtherFAMILY OF FRIENDSIndividual grant recipient: $47,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCENTRAL FL DREAMPLEX: $40,000 · OtherCENTRAL FL DREAMPLEXCHILDRENS MUSEUM: $38,700 · OtherCHILDRENS MUSEUMTHE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $33,500 · OtherHEROES HEALING HOMESTEAD INC: $30,000 · OtherKILCHER LIVING HOMESTEAD MUSEUM: $30,000 · OtherSOLDIERS UNDERTAKING DISABLED SCUBA DIVI: $25,000 · Other+35 more: $265,968 · Other+35 moreCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC: $145,000 · Recreation & SportsCHESAPEAKE REGION AC…UNITED STATES SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES SAILIN…SLB FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Recreation & SportsSLB FOUNDATION+1 more: $5,307 · Recreation & SportsNew Mexico Childrens Foundation: $102,500 · Human ServicesNew Mexico Chil…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIO…ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $12,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE DOGS…FREEDOM RIDE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM RIDE IN…+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5,000 · HealthPROJECT YESINC: $38,250 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWINTER GARDEN ART ASSOCIATION: $16,200 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHWESTERN ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAN INDIAN ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$710,668Recreation & Sports$224,307Human Services$174,000Health$45,000Education$38,250Philanthropy$30,000Arts & Culture$26,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC: $145,000 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetNew Mexico Childrens Foundation: $102,500 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetUNITED STATES SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $47,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT YESINC: $38,250 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT: $34,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budget23RD VETERAN: $22,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDec My Room Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSLB FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetWINTER GARDEN ART ASSOCIATION: $16,200 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFREEDOM RIDE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $8,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION FISHIN' CORPORATION: $5,307 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAN INDIAN ARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION 300 INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSKI FOR LIGHT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOPS LIFE CARES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKIDS BEATING CANCER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico Childrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT YESINC ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds 23RD VETERAN ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dec My Room Inc ↗
  • Who funds SLB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINTER GARDEN ART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM RIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
  • Who funds ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FISHIN' CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Livingry Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jack Kagan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jack Kagan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack Kagan’s filings →

More from the funding graph