Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ironwood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$33kEducation$20kPhilanthropy$8kCivil Rights$5kEnvironment$5kArts & Culture$4kReligion$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$126k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF ME$2,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$1,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,000
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM$500
NATURE CONSERVANCY - PHOENIX$500
Individual grant recipient$500
DESERT BOTANICAL GARDENS$500
BISHOP'S MISSION$500
WATCH DUTY$500
UMOM - NEW DAY CENTERS PHOENIX$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
CA
AZ
HI
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 16 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$74k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Hospice of the Valley
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +55%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • MI
    MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • AF
    ASU FOUNDATION GAMMAGE VIP DONOR CL
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AC
    Acadia Center
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -49%
  • TM
    THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
3
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Days for Girls International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $19,600 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF ME: $14,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEAZ STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherAZ STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONASU FOUNDATION GAMMAGE VIP DONOR CL: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,975 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 · OtherJDRF - THE ARIZONA CHAPTER: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+8 more: $5,200 · Other+8 moreHospice of the Valley: $11,450 · Human ServicesHospice of the V…THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,200 · Crime & LegalHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $3,600 · Arts & CultureDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentAcadia Center: $1,000 · EnvironmentSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$56,775Human Services$11,950Crime & Legal$5,200Philanthropy$4,000Arts & Culture$3,600Environment$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHospice of the Valley: $11,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $3,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAcadia Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Acadia Center ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
  • Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Days For Girls International ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ironwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ironwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ironwood Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ironwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ironwood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph