Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ironwood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$33kEducation$20kPhilanthropy$8kCivil Rights$5kEnvironment$5kArts & Culture$4kReligion$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$126k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF ME$2,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$1,000
DESERT BOTANICAL GARDENS$500
NATURE CONSERVANCY - PHOENIX$500
BISHOP'S MISSION$500
UMOM - NEW DAY CENTERS PHOENIX$500
Individual grant recipient$500
WATCH DUTY$500
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
CA
AZ
HI
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$74k · 16 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$74k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+101%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Hospice of the Valley
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +39%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • MI
    MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • AF
    ASU FOUNDATION GAMMAGE VIP DONOR CL
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AC
    Acadia Centergraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +101%
  • TM
    THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
3
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Days for Girls International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $19,600 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF ME — $14,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEAZ STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherAZ STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONASU FOUNDATION GAMMAGE VIP DONOR CL — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,975 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherJDRF - THE ARIZONA CHAPTER — $2,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 · Other+8 more — $5,200 · Other+8 moreHospice of the Valley — $11,450 · Human ServicesHospice of the V…THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION — $500 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $5,200 · Crime & LegalHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM — $3,600 · Arts & CultureAcadia Center — $1,000 · EnvironmentDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE — $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$56,775Human Services$11,950Crime & Legal$5,200Philanthropy$4,000Arts & Culture$3,600Environment$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHospice of the Valley — $11,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $5,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM — $3,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAcadia Center — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE
  • Who funds Acadia Center
  • Who funds DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS
  • Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Days For Girls International

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ironwood Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ironwood Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ironwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph