Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Illges-Chenoweth Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$176kHealth$167kEducation$110kEnvironment$80kRecreation & Sports$34kInternational$30kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$20,000
RANCHLANDS FOUNDATION$12,000
TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER$10,500
BLACKROCK BAPTIST CHURCH$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ATHLETICS$6,500
FUNDACION MINISTERIO ESPIRITU DEL$5,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$5,000
FLORIDA BAPTIST CONVENTION$5,000
RUNNING WATER DRAW CARE CENTER$5,000
BIG OAK RANCH$5,000
CHILDREN'S OF ALABAMA$4,000
WOFFORD COLLEGE$3,000
ST MARYS ON THE HIGHLANDS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($516k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($95k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $5k → 13%KIDSPIRE: $1k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $875 → 8%KIDSPIRE: $600 → 8%KIDSPIRE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
OR
WY
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($95k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Panama$95k · 13 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of The Illges-Chenoweth Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Illges-Chenoweth Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$451k · 24 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$451k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+27%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentInternationalEducationReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    RUNNINGWATER DRAW CARE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +6%
  • SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +55%
  • TC
    The Children's Hospital of Alabama
    5× · 2021–2025 · $31k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CB
    COLEGIO BILINGUE EL BUEN PASTOR BOQ
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • TT
    THE TENNESSEE RIVER GORGE TRUST INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -15%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Duke University

To provide a superior liberal education, to prepare future members of learned professions, to advance the frontiers of knowledge, and to help those who suffer, cure disease, and promote health

Education
11
Triangle Land Conservancy Inc

Triangle land conservancy (tlc) strives to create a healthier and more vibrant triangle region by safeguarding clean water, protecting natural habitats, supporting local farms, and connecting people with nature through land protection and…

Environment
12
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Tennessee River Gorge Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Taraloka Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLACKROCK BAPTIST CHURCH: $45,500 · OtherBLACKROCK BAPTIST CHURCHFUNDACION BIBLIOTECA DE BOQUETE: $42,500 · OtherFUNDACION BIBLIOTECA DE BOQUETESOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $40,080 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERFLORIDA BAPTIST CONVENTION: $35,000 · OtherFLORIDA BAPTIST CONVENTIONFUNDACION MINISTERIO ESPIRITU LIRIO: $31,000 · OtherFUNDACION MINISTERIO ESPIRITU LIRIOTelluride Hospital District: $24,667 · OtherTelluride Hospital DistrictCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ALABAMA FOUN: $21,705 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ALABAMA FOUNFUNDACION MINISTERIO ESPIRITU DEL: $14,000 · OtherFUNDACION MINISTERIO ESPIRITU DEL V: $13,000 · OtherCOLEGIO BILINGUE EL BUEN PASTOR BOQ: $13,000 · Other+23 more: $105,210 · Other+23 moreRUNNINGWATER DRAW CARE CENTER INC: $58,000 · HealthRUNNINGWATER DRAW …The Children's Hospital of Alabama: $30,875 · HealthThe Children's Hos…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,333 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITE…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationSTEPHEN S…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationHILLSDALE…FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO: $7,000 · EducationFOUNTAIN …TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $24,050 · Recreation & SportsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 · ReligionRBC MINISTRIES: $3,000 · ReligionTHE TENNESSEE RIVER GORGE TRUST INC: $11,250 · EnvironmentNORTH CHICKAMAUGA CREEK CONSERVANCY: $7,250 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $8,000 · InternationalTaraloka Foundation: $2,000 · International
Other$385,662Health$97,208Education$52,000Recreation & Sports$24,050Religion$23,000Environment$18,500International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUNNINGWATER DRAW CARE CENTER INC: $58,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $40,080 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $30,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $24,050 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TENNESSEE RIVER GORGE TRUST INC: $11,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF ALABAMA INC: $4,375 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $3,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSPIRE: $2,975 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTaraloka Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMerrie-Woode Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUNNINGWATER DRAW CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE TENNESSEE RIVER GORGE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CHICKAMAUGA CREEK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds KIDSPIRE ↗
  • Who funds Taraloka Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Illges-Chenoweth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Illges-Chenoweth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illges-Chenoweth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph