Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hyder More Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$115kAnimals$98kHuman Services$29kEducation$17kInternational$5kHealth$3kScience & Tech$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$22,000
TEXAS CULTURAL TRUST$15,000
TEXAS BALLET THEATRE$5,000
BREAK THROUGH AT FWCD$5,000
THE FWCD FUND$2,500
LONE STAR FILM FESTIVAL$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,200
TWA FOUNDATION$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SIXTY AND BETTER: $10k → 11%SIXTY AND BETTER: $5k → 11%SIXTY AND BETTER: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 9 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$242k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+123%

Still filing today

56%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Cultural Trust Council
    6× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +100%
  • TB
    Texas Book Festival
    3× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +84%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2020 · $34k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MA
    MODERN ART MUSEUM OF FORT WORTH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
2
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
3
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
4
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
7
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
8
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
9
Tx Performing Chinese Arts
—
10
Miller Theatre Advisory Board Inc

MTAB acts as a steward of public and private funds to provide professional-caliber performances, free to the public, at Miller Outdoor Theatre for the cultural enrichment of Houston's diverse communities and visitors to the city.

Arts & Culture
11
Texas Association of Builders

Trade Association for Texas Builders

—
12
Texas Bar Foundation

The Foundation solicits charitable contributions and provides funding to enhance the rule of law and the system of justice in Texas, especially for programs that relate to the administration of justice; ethics in the legal profession;…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Ballet Theater Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ftc International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $119,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $34,000 · OtherTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MUSICBREAK THROUGH AT FWCD: $12,500 · OtherBREAK THROUGH AT FWCDIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherMODERN ART MUSEUM OF FORT WORTH: $10,000 · Other+15 more: $44,000 · Other+15 moreTexas Cultural Trust Council: $55,550 · PhilanthropyTexas Cultural Tru…NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $8,050 · Arts & CultureTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSIXTY AND BETTER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesTexas Book Festival: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFTC INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · InternationalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · Health
Other$230,000Philanthropy$55,550Arts & Culture$20,050Human Services$18,000Recreation & Sports$10,000International$5,000Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas Cultural Trust Council: $55,550 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSIXTY AND BETTER INC: $18,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTexas Book Festival: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $8,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFTC INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTaking Care of Texas: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas Cultural Trust Council ↗
  • Who funds SIXTY AND BETTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Book Festival ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FTC INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Taking Care of Texas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Bratton Family Foundation · Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust · The Roach Foundation Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · The Alcon Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hyder More Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hyder More Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hyder More’s filings →

    More from the funding graph