Skip to content
The Hyde Family Charitable Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

The Hyde Family Charitable Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2022
16
Grants FY2022
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

91% of The Hyde Family Charitable Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Hyde Family Charitable Fund named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $420k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’20
11
’21
8
’22
6
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$19MArts & Culture$809kEducation$173kYouth Development$119kInternational$75kHealth$55kHuman Services$45kReligion$32kOther$0
02FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
PAINE ART CENTER$100,000
SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$40,000
SAY YES TO EDUCATION - BUFFALO$40,000
SANDWICH CHILDREN'S CENTER$20,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES$20,000
BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY$18,000
MURPH'S LIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL$10,000
CHILDREN'S WELL-BEING FOUNDATION$10,000
MINNESOTA ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$10,000
CHICAGO ABORTION FUND$10,000
THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE FREE RELATIONSHIPS$10,000
MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MURPH'S LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%MURPH'S LIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%SANDWICH CHILDREN'S CENTER: $20k → 9%PARENT INFANT CENTER: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-25%

Still filing today

40%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $360k · revenue +119%
  • BF
    BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $143k · revenue +59%
  • SM
    SETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -26%
  • GC
    GOLDEN CIVIC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +336%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Public Interest Law Center

The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…

Crime & Legal
2
Berkeley Public Library Foundation

The Berkeley Public Library Foundation (BPLF) amplifies the public investment to make a great public library extraordinary. To that end, we provide vital funds and ongoing advocacy to advance the Library's mission, vision, and strategic…

Philanthropy
3
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

—
4
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
5
The Conversationalist
—
6
New York Abortion Access Fund

The New York Abortion Access Fund (NYAAF) supports New Yorkers and people traveling to New York State to access abortion care through financial assistance, case management, and connections to other resources.

—
7
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
8
Health Access Fund

Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.

Health
9
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
10
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
11
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
12
Association for Public Art

The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $18,900,838 · PhilanthropyOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION+3 more: $385,000 · PhilanthropyPAINE ART CENTER: $291,175 · OtherSAY YES TO EDUCATION - BUFFALO: $120,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $90,000 · OtherGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $32,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S WELL-BEING FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Other+17 more: $147,550 · OtherBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY: $143,000 · Arts & CultureSETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesSANDWICH CHILDRENS CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARENT-INFANT CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationQUATREFOIL LIBRARY: $2,500 · EducationALIVE Rescue NFP: $20,000 · AnimalsPHILLY BULLY TEAM: $10,000 · AnimalsPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 · HealthSmall Choices Foundation: $5,000 · Health
Philanthropy$19,285,838Other$745,725Arts & Culture$158,000Human Services$55,000Education$32,500Animals$30,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $18,900,838 over 5y, 11% of budgetSHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $360,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY: $143,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALIVE Rescue NFP: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSANDWICH CHILDRENS CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLY BULLY TEAM: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDEN CIVIC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARENT-INFANT CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetQUATREFOIL LIBRARY: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chubb Charitable Foun…Baird Foundation IncThe Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
Chubb Charitable FoundationPA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hyde Family Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hyde Family Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hyde Family Charitable Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Hyde Family Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hyde Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home