· Private foundation
The Huneeus Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $171k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $210k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOGAR DE CRISTO USA INC | $1,500,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY IN CHILE | $600,000 |
| FUNDACION DE BENEFICIENCIA | $600,000 |
| TEACH FOR ALL | $277,610 |
| FUNDACION NINOS PRIMERO | $130,000 |
| FUNDACION SENTIDOS | $80,000 |
| FUNDACION EDUCACIONAL CHOSHUENCO | $46,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES | $15,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | $10,000 |
| CENTRO CHILENO LAUTARO | $3,000 |
| MENTIS | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 87% of grant dollars ($19M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($2.9M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 13% of all-years giving ($2.9M)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $358k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HDHOGAR DE CRISTO USA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +4% · 94% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY IN CHILE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue ×21 · 38% of their budget
- NVNAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- OHOLE HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +136%
- CFCENTER FOR JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL LAWone grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -77%
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chile-California Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOGAR DE CRISTO USA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY IN CHILE INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Dolphin Swimming and Boating Foundation ↗
- Who funds Chile-California Council ↗
- Who funds MENTIS ↗
- Who funds DEATH PENALTY FOCUS ↗
- Who funds Baykeeper ↗
- Who funds Cope Family Center ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc ↗
- Who funds Music in the Vineyards Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · Tides Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Huneeus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.