Skip to content
The Hosanna Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Hosanna Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$496k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$496k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$529kHealth$54kHousing & Shelter$47kReligion$39kFood & Nutrition$22kRecreation & Sports$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$496,424
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USCHARITABLE GIFT TRUST-HOSANNA FUND$496,424
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP PATRIOT: $1k → 17%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $2k → 11%WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $1k → 8%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EXODUS REFUGEE IMMIGRATION INC: $4k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%EXODUS REFUGEE IMMIGRATION INC: $3k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $4k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 22 repeat orgs$538k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
24

Total granted

$205k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+28%

Still filing today

55%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $496k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TRINITY FREE CLINIC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +138%
  • GF
    GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +180%
  • CI
    CAMPTOWN INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +27%
  • MF
    MUSIC FOR RELIEF
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • VO
    VOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
3
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
8
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Shelterbox Usa Inc

The mission of shelterbox usa is to deliver humanitarian relief in the form of equipment and materials that bring shelter, warmth & dignity to people made homeless by natural or other disasters worldwide.

Human Services
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
25/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USCHARITABLE GIFT TRUST-HOSANNA FUND: $496,424 · OtherUSCHARITABLE GIFT TRUST-HOSANNA FUNDHOLY FAMILY SHELTER: $37,250 · OtherHOLY FAMILY SHELTER+29 more: $125,500 · Other+29 moreWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesExodus Refugee Immigration Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesEDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,500 · Human ServicesCAMP PATRIOT CORP: $1,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $1,000 · Human ServicesBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY FREE CLINIC INC: $19,750 · HealthHealthwell Foundation: $2,000 · HealthBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People: $2,000 · HealthCAMPTOWN INC: $9,500 · Recreation & SportsBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $500 · Recreation & SportsHumane Society for Hamilton County: $9,000 · AnimalsSECOND HELPINGS INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $1,500 · Food & NutritionTREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$659,174Human Services$27,000Health$23,750Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$9,000Food & Nutrition$8,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY FREE CLINIC INC: $19,750 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPTOWN INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetExodus Refugee Immigration Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $5,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthwell Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton County Commu…United Way of Central…Central Indiana Commu…Lilly Endowment IncDuke Energy FoundationThe Brave Heart Found…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…The Indianapolis Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…
Hamilton County Community Foundation IncIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hosanna Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hosanna Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hosanna’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home