Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hosanna Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$496k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$496k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Human Services$529kHealth$54kHousing & Shelter$47kReligion$39kFood & Nutrition$22kRecreation & Sports$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$496,424
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USCHARITABLE GIFT TRUST-HOSANNA FUND$496,424
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP PATRIOT: $1k → 17%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $2k → 11%WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $1k → 8%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $1k → 11%EXODUS REFUGEE IMMIGRATION INC: $4k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%EXODUS REFUGEE IMMIGRATION INC: $3k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $4k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$205k · 22 repeat orgs$538k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
24

Total granted

$205k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+28%

Still filing today

55%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $496k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TRINITY FREE CLINIC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +138%
  • GF
    GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +180%
  • CI
    CAMPTOWN INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +27%
  • MF
    MUSIC FOR RELIEF
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
3
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
8
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Shelterbox Usa Inc

The mission of shelterbox usa is to deliver humanitarian relief in the form of equipment and materials that bring shelter, warmth & dignity to people made homeless by natural or other disasters worldwide.

Human Services
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceHomeless Services & ShelterUnited Way FederationsClassical Music EnsemblesVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionEarly Childhood Education C…Land Conservation Organizat…Community Health CentersLgbtq+ Community CentersCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Youth CampsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr14%33%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr23%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr14%39%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr23%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,963

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
25/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

USCHARITABLE GIFT TRUST-HOSANNA FUND — $496,424 · OtherUSCHARITABLE GIFT TRUST-HOSANNA FUNDHOLY FAMILY SHELTER — $37,250 · OtherHOLY FAMILY SHELTER+29 more — $125,500 · Other+29 moreWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesExodus Refugee Immigration Inc — $6,000 · Human ServicesEDELWEISS HOUSE INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,500 · Human ServicesBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesCAMP PATRIOT CORP — $1,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS — $1,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY FREE CLINIC INC — $19,750 · HealthBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People — $2,000 · HealthHealthwell Foundation — $2,000 · HealthCAMPTOWN INC — $9,500 · Recreation & SportsBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS — $500 · Recreation & SportsHumane Society for Hamilton County — $9,000 · AnimalsSECOND HELPINGS INC — $7,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $1,500 · Food & NutritionTREVOR PROJECT INC — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$659,174Human Services$27,000Health$23,750Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$9,000Food & Nutrition$8,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRINITY FREE CLINIC INC — $19,750 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPTOWN INC — $9,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetExodus Refugee Immigration Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDELWEISS HOUSE INC — $5,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthwell Foundation — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton County Community Foundation IncIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hosanna Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph