· Private foundation
The Hochberg Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| SQUASHDRIVE | $13,205 |
| CONGREGATION BETH DAVID | $6,400 |
| AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOC FOUNDATION | $5,375 |
| SHARON PLAYHOUSE | $5,000 |
| DIGNITY OF WORK INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $2,613 |
| INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT PREVENTION & RESOLUTION INC | $2,583 |
| COLLEGE OF COMMERCIAL ARBITRATORS | $1,790 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD INC | $1,690 |
| AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE | $1,535 |
| CLARK MUSEUM | $1,200 |
| SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE | $1,000 |
| COUNCIL FOREIGN RELATIONS | $773 |
| Individual grant recipient | $700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $669) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSQUASHDRIVE4× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +28%
- SASQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +315%
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART5× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- BUBRYANT UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
- URUKRAINE RELIEFone grant, 2022 · $3k
- EWEXCEPTIONAL WOMEN ALLIANCEone grant, 2022 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Academy of Medicine and the most unlike its peers is The Matthew Harris Ornstein Memorial Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 67 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds SQUASHDRIVE ↗
- Who funds SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds BRYANT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT PREVENTION & RESOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MATTHEW HARRIS ORNSTEIN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF COMMERICAL ARBITRATORS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds STERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GRAYSON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BOARD OF THORACIC SURGERY INC ↗
- Who funds SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Nuvance Health ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF ARBITRATORS (NEW YORK BRANCH) INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hochberg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.