Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$587kEducation$335kHuman Services$293kFood & Nutrition$114kArts & Culture$86kHousing & Shelter$83kEnvironment$47kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHERIDAN COLLEGE - HOUSING SCH$50,000
THE HUB ON SMITH$30,000
SHERIDAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$20,000
THE BRINTON MUSEUM$12,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$10,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
LUNCH TOGETHERSOUP KITCH$10,000
GENESIS FOUNDATION INC$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BIGHORN DEVELOPMENT CENTER$5,000
PEOPLE ASSISTANCE FOOD BANK$4,000
THE FOOD GROUP$3,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCK$3,000
BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE HUB ON SMITH: $30k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $30k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $30k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $30k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $25k → 10%SHERIDAN SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $20k → 10%SHERIDAN SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $20k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $20k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $20k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%SHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$1.6M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +31%
  • TN
    THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +70%
  • SC
    SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
    7× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHERIDAN CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SH
    SHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • SC
    STORY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheridan Community Foundation

To support the sheridan community through charitable giving and to strengthen it with philanthropic education.

Philanthropy
2
Sheridan County Historical Society Incorporated

The mission shall be to bring together those people interested in history and especially the history of sheridan county, ks. understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life, gives us a better understanding…

Arts & Culture
3
Sheridan County Historical Society

Preserve and share our rich heritage, engaging present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
4
Sheridan Child Development Center

Provide quality, nurturing child care

Human Services
5
Sheridan Community Center

To provide and maintain a community center/building that offers space for various events and organizations in sheridan, texas and the local surrounding area.

Human Services
6
Downtown Sheridan Association

To preserve, enhance, and promote historic downtown sheridan to ensure future prosperity. the downtown sheridan area serves as the heartbeat of the community where people come together to enjoy local services, convenient shopping, and…

Community Improvement
7
Sheridan County Library Foundation

Sheridan county fulmer public library and the library's branches: for books, materials and equipment. all users of the library and the library's branches will benefit.

—
8
Shoshoni Senior Citizens Inc

The purpose of the entity is to provide activities, wellness and nutrition programs for senior citizens in shoshoni, wy and the surrounding area.

Human Services
9
Sheridan Kids Life

Christian ministry reaching youth for christ in sheridan, wyoming and the surrounding areas.

Youth Development
10
Sherborn Rural Land Foundation
Environment
11
Sheyenne Valley Community Foundation

Organlized and operated to receive, manage and distribute gifts made to the foundation for charitable, religious, educational, literary or scientific purposes within barnes, ransom and griggs counties of north dakota

Philanthropy
12
The Sherman Museum

Preservation and education of history and historical items of interest for the citizens and visitors of sherman, tx.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheridan Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Horn Education Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $284,200 · OtherSHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $262,500 · OtherSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INCSHERIDAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $187,500 · OtherSHERIDAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONSHERIDAN COLLEGE: $120,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COLLEGESHERIDAN COLLEGE - HOUSING SCH: $59,000 · OtherLUNCH TOGETHER SOUP KITCHEN: $59,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · Other+14 more: $127,100 · Other+14 moreSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $225,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN COU…GENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $46,000 · Human ServicesGENESIS FOUNDATION…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH: $86,000 · Arts & CultureSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $47,000 · EnvironmentBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $20,000 · EducationSHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB: $6,000 · EducationSTORY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC: $2,000 · EducationTHE FOOD GROUP INC: $25,500 · Food & NutritionCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES: $19,500 · Crime & LegalCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC: $6,000 · Health
Other$1,144,300Human Services$273,000Arts & Culture$86,000Environment$47,000Education$28,000Food & Nutrition$25,500Crime & Legal$19,500Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $262,500 over 5y, 32% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $225,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH: $86,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $47,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetGENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $46,000 over 9y, 7.3% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC: $25,500 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $20,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES: $19,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB: $6,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds STORY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott FoundationWY26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Roberts Family Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · The Seidler Foundation · Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation · Chandler H Kibbee and Mercedes K Kibbee Foundation for Children · Harry & Thelma Surrena Memorial

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herbert & Dorothy Zullig’s filings →

    More from the funding graph