Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry & Thelma Surrena Memorial

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$285k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$1.3MEducation$284kReligion$177kFood & Nutrition$140kHousing & Shelter$44kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S CENTER$35,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER - BUFFALO$35,000
GENESIS FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JOHNSON COUNTY YMCA$20,000
LUNCH TOGETHER SOUP KITCHEN$15,000
SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL$15,000
THE FOOD GROUP$15,000
BREAD OF LIFE$15,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$15,000
TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S$15,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY$5,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF$5,000
COMPASS-CENTER FOR FAMILIES$5,000
STORY BRANCH LIBRARY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $649k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $30k → 10%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $15k → 10%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $15k → 10%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $15k → 10%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $15k → 10%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $10k → 10%TONGUE RIVER CHILD'S: $10k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $50k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $15k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $10k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $10k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $10k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $8k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $8k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $8k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 25 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
0

Total granted

$2.1M
$0

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +3%
  • GF
    GENESIS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +90% · 29% of their budget
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $124k · revenue +23%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming

    Provide activities for low income children

    Youth Development
    2
    Lakota Child Care Center

    Provide safe, affordable childcare to the area.

    Human Services
    3
    Sunshine Childcare Center At Northeastern

    The mission of the logan county childhood collaborative (dba sunshine childcare center) is to provide high quality childcare in a safe, secure and nurturing environment that fosters healthy social emotional development. our goal is that…

    Human Services
    4
    Park City School District Child Care Center Inc

    School district child care center

    5
    Ringgold County Child Care Center

    Community child care center

    Human Services
    6
    Gem County Senior Community Center Corporation

    To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors

    Human Services
    7
    Yosemite National Park Child Care Center

    Provide affordable child care to employees working in yosemite national park and surrounds.

    Human Services
    8
    Central Montana Childcare Alliance

    Partner with childcare providers, families, and stakeholders to improve the quality of programming and expand the availability of childcare options in central montana.

    Human Services
    9
    Danville Boyle Co Senior Citizens Inc

    Support senior citizens in boyle county by providing a functioning senior center.

    Human Services
    10
    Sierra County Child Abuse Council

    Child abuse awareness and prevention

    Crime & Legal
    11
    Child Care Center of the Common Ground Foundation

    Provide child care services to the community for children ages 16 weeks to 12 years.

    Human Services
    12
    Sherman County Community Services Inc

    To provide a community service by providing a place where a family can enjoy a safe environment

    Community Improvement

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies and the most unlike its peers is Overland Elementary Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    CHILDREN'S CENTER - BUFFALO — $350,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER - BUFFALOIndividual grant recipient — $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHERIDAN COLLEGE — $85,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COLLEGELUNCH TOGETHER SOUP KITCHEN — $75,000 · OtherLUNCH TOGETHER SOUP KITCHENBREAD OF LIFE — $75,000 · OtherBREAD OF LIFEMETHODIST CHURCH — $61,500 · OtherBUFFALO SENIOR CENTER INC — $51,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY — $45,000 · OtherSTORY BRANCH LIBRARY — $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $44,000 · OtherCLEARMONT COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY LIBRARY — $40,000 · OtherSTORY COMMUNITY CHURCH — $40,000 · Other+3 more — $46,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER — $235,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CENTERGENESIS FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 · Human ServicesGENESIS FOUNDATION INCSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL — $123,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCILTONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACE — $110,000 · Human ServicesTONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACEJOHNSON COUNTY FAMILY YMCA — $155,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE FOOD GROUP INC — $65,000 · Food & NutritionCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES — $35,000 · Crime & LegalOVERLAND ELEMENTARY PTO — $29,000 · Education
    Other$1,193,000Human Services$648,500Recreation & Sports$155,000Food & Nutrition$65,000Crime & Legal$35,000Education$29,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER — $235,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetGENESIS FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetJOHNSON COUNTY FAMILY YMCA — $155,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL — $123,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACE — $110,000 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC — $65,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetBUFFALO SENIOR CENTER INC — $51,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES — $37,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES — $35,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER
    • Who funds GENESIS FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds JOHNSON COUNTY FAMILY YMCA
    • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    • Who funds TONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACE
    • Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC
    • Who funds BUFFALO SENIOR CENTER INC
    • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES
    • Who funds COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES
    • Who funds OVERLAND ELEMENTARY PTO

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Wyoming Community Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · The Roberts Family Foundation · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig Foundation · George Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Litt -The Ray and Kay Littler Trust · The Seidler Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Harry & Thelma Surrena Memorial funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph