Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Henry B Tippie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.7MArts & Culture$3.0MReligion$2.1MScience & Tech$192kHealth$116kPublic Benefit$100kPhilanthropy$57kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $328k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.0M
$13,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$3,000,000
ST JOHN'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$128,000
CITY OF BELLE PLAINE IOWA$100,000
COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE FOUNDATION$100,000
HOSPICE AUSTIN$13,500
PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD$5,000
ROOM TO READ$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JAMAICA$2,000
CLEN-MOORE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $100k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
SC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of The Henry B Tippie Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 36%.

The Henry B Tippie Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 11 repeat orgs$585k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
19

Total granted

$8.6M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+29%

Still filing today

36%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +10%
  • HA
    HOSPICE AUSTIN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $114k · revenue +18%
  • RT
    ROOM TO READ
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE B-29 SQUADRON
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • CA
    COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE B-24 SQUADRON
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CC
    COE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
4
Junior Achievement of Greater South Carolina Inc

Junior achievement of greater south carolina (jagsc) is dedicated to inspiring and preparing young people to thrive in a global economy. through innovative learning experiences, ja focuses on three core areas: financial literacy,…

International
5
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
6
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
7
Lake Forest Academy

Lake forest academy strives to embody in its practices - and to cultivate in its students -excellence of character, scholarship, citizenship, and responsibility.

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
10
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
11
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance

To marshal and focus the resources and relationships needed to cure fa by raising funds for research, promoting public awareness and aligning scientists, patients, clinicians, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies dedicated to…

Health
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Austin; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE FOUNDATION: $2,645,109 · OtherCOMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE FOUNDATIONST JOHNS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC: $2,040,284 · OtherST JOHNS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INCCOMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE B-29 SQUADRON: $200,000 · OtherHENRY B TIPPIE NATIONAL AVIATION EDUCATION CENTER: $192,200 · Other+22 more: $475,500 · Other+22 moreALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3,510,000 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGE+1 more: $25,000 · EducationHOSPICE AUSTIN: $113,500 · Human ServicesFort Bend County Fair Association: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $2,000 · InternationalCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthCENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION: $100 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,553,093Education$3,535,000Human Services$113,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Youth Development$3,500International$2,000Health$1,000Crime & Legal$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3,510,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $113,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROOM TO READ: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 039 JENNINGS-BRADSHAW: $25,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetFort Bend County Fair Association: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 039 JENNINGS-BRADSHAW ↗
  • Who funds Fort Bend County Fair Association ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Jamaica Inc ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Henry B Tippie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Henry B Tippie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Henry B Tippie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Henry B Tippie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry B Tippie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph