Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Henry B Tippie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$3.7MArts & Culture$3.0MReligion$2.1MScience & Tech$192kHealth$116kPublic Benefit$100kPhilanthropy$57kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $328k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.0M
$13,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$3,000,000
ST JOHN'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$128,000
COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE FOUNDATION$100,000
CITY OF BELLE PLAINE IOWA$100,000
HOSPICE AUSTIN$13,500
PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD$5,000
ROOM TO READ$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JAMAICA$2,000
CLEN-MOORE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $100k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
SC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 33% of The Henry B Tippie Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 36% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Henry B Tippie Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 11 repeat orgs$585k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
19

Total granted

$8.6M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+29%

Still filing today

36%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +10%
  • RT
    ROOM TO READ
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +9%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE B-29 SQUADRON
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • CA
    COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE B-24 SQUADRON
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CC
    COE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
4
Junior Achievement of Greater South Carolina Inc

Junior achievement of greater south carolina (jagsc) is dedicated to inspiring and preparing young people to thrive in a global economy. through innovative learning experiences, ja focuses on three core areas: financial literacy,…

International
5
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
6
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

7
Lake Forest Academy

Lake forest academy strives to embody in its practices - and to cultivate in its students -excellence of character, scholarship, citizenship, and responsibility.

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

10
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

11
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance

To marshal and focus the resources and relationships needed to cure fa by raising funds for research, promoting public awareness and aligning scientists, patients, clinicians, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies dedicated to…

Health
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Austin and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE FOUNDATION — $2,645,109 · OtherCOMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE FOUNDATIONST JOHNS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC — $2,040,284 · OtherST JOHNS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INCCOMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE B-29 SQUADRON — $200,000 · OtherHENRY B TIPPIE NATIONAL AVIATION EDUCATION CENTER — $192,200 · Other+22 more — $475,500 · Other+22 moreALLEGHENY COLLEGE — $3,510,000 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGE+1 more — $25,000 · EducationHOSPICE AUSTIN — $113,500 · Human ServicesFort Bend County Fair Association — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc — $2,000 · InternationalCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthCENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION — $100 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,553,093Education$3,535,000Human Services$113,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Youth Development$3,500International$2,000Health$1,000Crime & Legal$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE — $3,510,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN — $113,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROOM TO READ — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 039 JENNINGS-BRADSHAW — $25,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetFort Bend County Fair Association — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 039 JENNINGS-BRADSHAW
  • Who funds Fort Bend County Fair Association
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC
  • Who funds American Friends of Jamaica Inc
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Henry B Tippie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Henry B Tippie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Henry B Tippie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph