Skip to content

California · Public charity

The Helen Diller Family Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the peninsula, marin and sonoma counties.

$956k
Granted FY2022
5
Itemized grants FY2022
5
Organizations funded FY2022
20%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of The Helen Diller Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Federation Of San Francisco The Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Helen Diller Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $416k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

33
’17
19
’18
9
’19
6
’20
6
’21
5
’22
0
’23
1
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2022
$416k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 33
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
3
Total assets, FY2022
$5.0M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 20% of the organizations The Helen Diller Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 24% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20225$416k20%
FY20216$367k33%
FY20206$384k0%
FY20199$473k11%
FY201819$13M5%
FY201733$21Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$19MEducation$11MRecreation & Sports$9.1MReligion$6.4MHousing & Shelter$3.0MInternational$2.6MArts & Culture$523kCivil Rights$320kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
CA
VA
AZ
DC
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Trust for Public Land$9,100,00024%
University of California San Francisco Foundation$6,712,7891n/a
Congregation Kol Emeth$5,011,9996n/a
Amer Tr for Oxford Univ & Eastman 067381-000$4,000,000384%
The Jewish Home and Senior Living Foundation$3,000,001324%
Nli USA Inc$3,000,000433%
Jewish Institute for National Security of America$600,00062%
The Philos Project Inc$600,00068%
Chabad of Greater South Bay$575,0002n/a
Friends of Elnet$550,00062%
Show all 40 grantees
All grantees of The Helen Diller Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Trust for Public Land$9,100,00024%
University of California San Francisco Foundation$6,712,7891n/a
Congregation Kol Emeth$5,011,9996n/a
Amer Tr for Oxford Univ & Eastman 067381-000$4,000,000384%
The Jewish Home and Senior Living Foundation$3,000,001324%
Nli USA Inc$3,000,000433%
Jewish Institute for National Security of America$600,00062%
The Philos Project Inc$600,00068%
Chabad of Greater South Bay$575,0002n/a
Friends of Elnet$550,00062%
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$300,00020%
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc$300,00021%
American Israel Education Foundation Inc$300,00020%
Central Fund of Israel$225,0001n/a
Judicial Watch Inc$200,00020%
David Horowitz Freedom Center$175,00013%
American Media Institute$175,00029%
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc$150,00012%
Tea Party Patriots Foundation Inc$150,000136%
American Freedom Law Center Inc Dba Aflc % Cindy Page$100,00018%
Chabad Np$100,0001n/a
Project Veritas$100,00011%
Berkeley Music Group$100,00012%
Center for Jewish Community Studies$100,00015%
Jerusalem Foundation Inc$75,00010%
Carnegie Mellon University$75,00010%
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art$64,26330%
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc$51,00020%
Family House Inc$50,00011%
The Contemporary Jewish Museum$38,90020%
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation$25,00011%
Turning Point USA Inc$25,00010%
AMCHA Initiative$20,00023%
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley$20,00020%
Elem Youth in Distress Inc$18,00012%
Birthright Israel Foundation$18,00010%
The American Friends of the Association for the Advancement Of$18,00015%
Jewish Funders Network$10,00010%
Cultures in Context Incorporated$10,0001n/a
Institute on Aging$10,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

The Helen Diller Family Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 34 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trust for Public Land: $9,100,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetAmer Tr for Oxford Univ & Eastman 067381-000: $4,000,000 over 3y, 84% of budgetThe Jewish Home and Senior Living Foundation: $3,000,001 over 3y, 24% of budgetNli USA Inc: $3,000,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetJewish Institute for National Security of America: $600,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetThe Philos Project Inc: $600,000 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetFriends of Elnet: $550,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Israel Education Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJudicial Watch Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDavid Horowitz Freedom Center: $175,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAmerican Media Institute: $175,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetMiddle East Media and Research Institute Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTea Party Patriots Foundation Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetAmerican Freedom Law Center Inc Dba Aflc % Cindy Page: $100,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetProject Veritas: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBerkeley Music Group: $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCenter for Jewish Community Studies: $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetJerusalem Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Museum of Modern Art: $64,263 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $51,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFamily House Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Contemporary Jewish Museum: $38,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetInvestigative Project on Terrorism Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTurning Point USA Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMCHA Initiative: $20,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSecond Harvest of Silicon Valley: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElem Youth in Distress Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBirthright Israel Foundation: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Friends of the Association for the Advancement Of: $18,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetJewish Funders Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute on Aging: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 34.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA28.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Communal Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Koret Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Marin Community Foundation · California Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Helen Diller Family Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Helen Diller Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Helen Diller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Helen Diller Family Foundation

How much does The Helen Diller Family Foundation give?
The Helen Diller Family Foundation reported 5 itemized grants totaling $415,660, out of $955,660 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 33 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does The Helen Diller Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (36%), Education (21%), Recreation & Sports (17%).
Who are The Helen Diller Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Trust for Public Land ($9.1M), University of California San Francisco Foundation ($6.7M), Congregation Kol Emeth ($5.0M).
Does The Helen Diller Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Helen Diller Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, Jewish Communal Fund, The San Francisco Foundation.
Where is The Helen Diller Family Foundation based?
The Helen Diller Family Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helen Diller Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph