Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hegman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$26k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Hegman Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Hegman Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $95k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’20
0
’22
5
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$15MYouth Development$55kHealth$43kEnvironment$25kReligion$15kHousing & Shelter$7kCommunity Improvement$5kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLYMOUTH CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER$26,000
MOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCH$15,000
MINNESOTA OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE$15,000
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM$12,500
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$6,000
WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS$5,000
PROJECT FOR PRIDE AND LIVING$5,000
NC LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE$5,000
EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION$3,100
YOUTH FRONTIERS$1,000
OUTING MN VOLUNTEER LIBRARY$750
WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE PROGRAM$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PROJECT FOR PRIDE AND LIVING: $5k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS: $1k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE AND LIVING: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 6 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$122k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+28%

Still filing today

83%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +36%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +12%
  • PF
    PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • MO
    MOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • NC
    N C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • TW
    THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLISgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
4
Women's Foundation of Minnesota

Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…

Philanthropy
5
Minneapolis Parks Foundation

The Minneapolis Parks Foundation transforms human lives through parks and public spaces by aligning philanthropic investment and community vision.

Recreation & Sports
6
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
7
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
8
Minnesota Private College Council Inc

The minnesota private college council serves the shared needs of its member colleges and advocates for public policy that meets the educational needs of students, enhances private higher education, and strengthens minnesota's economic and…

Education
9
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
10
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
11
Camp Fire Minnesota

With nature as our catalyst, we energize youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
12
Minnesota Private College Fund

The minnesota private college fund serves the shared needs of its members by seeking philanthropic support from corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of its member colleges and universities and the students they educate.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Frontiers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wild and Free Wildlife Rehab Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $14,501,416 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+1 more: $25,000 · PhilanthropyPLYMOUTH CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER: $51,000 · OtherMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM: $25,000 · OtherMOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherVETS WITH A MISSION (VWAM): $5,000 · Other+3 more: $4,455 · OtherMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc: $25,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · HealthN C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC: $5,000 · HealthPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$14,526,416Other$100,455Health$43,000Human Services$8,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $14,501,416 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER: $51,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetN C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM: $605 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hegman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hegman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hegman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph