Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Heaven on Earth Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$385k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$5.3MHealth$800kEducation$687kInternational$382kCommunity Improvement$75kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRONG TOWER CHURCH$160,000
ADVANCE FOR LIFE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$150,000
MARY SHANNON MINISTRIES$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHEEP DOG IMPACT ASSISTANCE: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
AR
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 16 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$4.8M
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+56%

Still filing today

25%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CADENCE INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2017–2020 · $132k · revenue +7%
  • DP
    DREAM PROJECT INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +70%
  • MF
    MIO Frontiers
    3× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH OF THE VALLEY
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • CO
    CHOICES OF PREGNANCY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $400k
  • NB
    NEW BEGINNINGS CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
2
Thrive Church Planting
Religion
3
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
4
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
5
Explore God Network
—
6
Equippers Group International

To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.

Religion
7
Dove On the Rise International

Expansion of the Gospel of Christ through training literature and digital teaching materials.

—
8
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
9
Transform Ministries
—
10
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
11
Masters Design Group

To provide training for churches and missions. Master's Design Group participates in local and international training and ministry and provides ongoing mentoring and resources for church and missions organizations.

Religion
12
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Training Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Accelerate Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $1,881,267 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCHCHRIST CHURCH OF THE VALLEY: $1,000,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH OF THE VALLEYADVANCE FOR LIFE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $450,000 · OtherADVANCE FOR LIFE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYCHOICES OF PREGNANCY CENTER: $400,000 · OtherCHOICES OF PREGNANCY CENTERNEW BEGINNINGS CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $275,000 · OtherRETURN HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $250,000 · OtherTHE CROSS CHURCH: $250,000 · Other+20 more: $2,023,100 · Other+20 moreChristian Research Institute Inc: $550,000 · ReligionChristian Res…MARY SHANNON MINISTRIES: $220,000 · ReligionMARY SHANNON …Petra International Ministries Inc: $100,000 · ReligionPetra Interna…GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Religion+2 more: $45,500 · ReligionDREAM PROJECT INC: $100,000 · EducationSheep Dog Impact Assistance: $9,000 · Human Services
Other$6,829,367Religion$965,500Education$100,000Human Services$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Research Institute Inc: $550,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetMARY SHANNON MINISTRIES: $220,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetCADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $132,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPetra International Ministries Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDREAM PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetMISSION CREATE: $75,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAccelerate Group Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $20,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSheep Dog Impact Assistance: $9,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Research Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARY SHANNON MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CADENCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Petra International Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREAM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION CREATE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Accelerate Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds Sheep Dog Impact Assistance ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Heaven on Earth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Heaven on Earth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heaven on Earth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph