· Private foundation
The Haugh Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1941 HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT GROUP INC | $1,041,549 |
| THE BEACON OF HOPE CAYMAN FOUNDATION LTD | $34,512 |
| SAN MARCOS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL | $2,000 |
| SEATTLE UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 48% of grant dollars ($1.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 52% that went abroad ($1.7M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 52% of all-years giving ($1.7M)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2020 · $253k · revenue +72%
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +196%- SUSEATTLE UNIVERSITY4× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- FAFlabob Aviation Associatesgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +160% · 67% of their budget
- CICAYMAN ISLANDS CHARITY NETWORK INCone grant, 2018 · $40k
- HFHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide hope, education and support to sarcoma patients and their families in the pacific northwest while investing in research to improve cure rates for sarcomas.
To deliver accessible world-class student experiences by providing quality programs and services that ensure student success through meaningful learning. to be an inclusive and innovative university serving life-long learners who…
Since 1997, The Livestrong Foundation has served and supported over 14.2 million people affected by cancer through survivorship programs, publications and collaborative partnerships with community and grassroots organziations to ensure a…
Veteran Life Assistance and Scholarship programs for SEAL, Underwater Demolition Tean and Special Warfare Veterans and their families.
The santa monica college foundation leads the private fundraising efforts of santa monica college in support of the college's mission to provide open and affordable access to high quality education. the foundation receives, disperses and…
San francisco firefighters cancer prevention foundation (sffcpf) is committed to the prevention and early detection of cancer and providing access to cutting edge care for active and retired members of the san francisco fire department and…
To support seattle pacific university. the foundation may make gifts and grants to other religious, educational and charitable organizations as determined by the board of directors.
Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…
The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…
The mission of the falcon foundation is to further the opportunity for highly motivated, exceptional, young men and women to attend the united states air force academy through the award of falcon foundation scholarships at junior college…
First command educational foundation (the "foundation") is a 501(c)(3) public charity that provides grant support for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and conducts financial educational programs. the…
Established in 1993, the Naval Helicopter Association Scholarship Fund has supported members of the Naval rotary wing community active duty personnel, veterans, and their dependents, in pursuit of higher education goals by providing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farestart and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 1941 Historical Aircraft Group ↗
- Who funds NAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Flabob Aviation Associates ↗
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Palomar College Foundation ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHIRLEY HOME FOR THE AGED INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SAN MARCOS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEP HOUSE OF NORTH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Escuela Adelante ↗
- Who funds Martial Arts for Life ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ZERO PROSTATE CANCER ↗
- Who funds Seattle Police Foundation ↗
- Who funds BARBELLS FOR BOOBS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN LAKE VETERANS GOLF COURSE ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds WEST SEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Homeless Backpacks Inc ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds National Canine Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Haugh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Naval Aviation Museum Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Haugh Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Haugh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.