Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hart Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.0MYouth Development$332kRecreation & Sports$230kEducation$131kReligion$125kFood & Nutrition$73kArts & Culture$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
LAKE GROVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
P E O FOUNDATION$25,000
PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPLAINCY INC$10,000
BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$6,000
ZONTA CLUB OF EVERETT FOUNDATION$5,000
VESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC$5,000
EDWARDS CENTER INC$5,000
NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH$2,000
PALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC$2,000
LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION$2,000
WHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LAKE OSWEGO MEAL NETWORK ADVISORY BOARD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $6k → 12%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX: $2k → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $2k → 14%OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $3k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $6k → 12%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX: $2k → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $2k → 14%OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $1k → 12%THDF II INC: $5k → 8%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $6k → 12%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2k → 17%FATHERS HEART STREET MINISTRY: $2k → 8%FATHERS HEART STREET MINISTRY: $2k → 8%ST MARYS HOME: $10k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $2k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $2k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $2k → 8%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $2k → 8%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $1k → 8%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
NY
OR
IA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 43% of The Hart Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Hart Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 34 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
29

Total granted

$2.9M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+24%

Still filing today

82%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +91%
  • SELF ENHANCEMENT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $319k · revenue +114%
  • MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP
    6× · 2017–2022 · $152k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $130k
  • LH
    LAKERIDGE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • PS
    PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPLAINCY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
2
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
3
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
4
The Arc Oregon

The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
5
Oregon Child Development Coalition

Oregon child development coalition is dedicated to improving the lives of children and families by providing early childhood education, care and advocacy with unique and supportive services to enhance family growth and community success.

Human Services
6
Family Forward Oregon

We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.

Human Services
7
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
8
United Way of the Columbia-Willamette

At United Way of the Columbia-Willamette (UWCW), we envision an Oregon and Southwest Washington where every child and family - regardless of geography, race, or family incomehas a stable foundation and access to the resources and support…

Philanthropy
9
Path Home

To empower homeless families with children to get back into housing - and to stay there.

Housing & Shelter
10
Oregon Community Food System Network

The oregon community food systems network brings people and organizations together to broaden understanding of issues, build relationships and trust, develop common purpose, and create collective capacity to realize our shared vision.

Food & Nutrition
11
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation; the most unlike its peers is WaterAfrica. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
39/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,798,000 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONPEO Foundation: $101,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Education+4 more: $22,000 · EducationSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $319,000 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INCMT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP: $152,450 · OtherMT HOOD KIWANIS CAMPOHSU FOUNDATION: $130,000 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATIONLAKE GROVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $95,000 · OtherLAKE GROVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPublic Safety Chaplaincy Inc: $40,000 · Other+32 more: $174,200 · Other+32 moreBONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $10,000 · Human ServicesST MARY'S HOME: $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $9,000 · Human ServicesTHDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund: $5,000 · Human ServicesOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $4,000 · Human ServicesFathers Heart Street Ministry: $4,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $4,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesVESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · HealthPALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC: $9,000 · HealthTWLOHA INC: $4,000 · HealthPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $2,000 · HealthTRI-CITIES PREGNANCY NETWORK: $2,000 · HealthOLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC: $48,000 · Arts & CultureEDWARDS CENTER INC: $20,000 · EmploymentHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $2,000 · EmploymentWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES: $16,000 · Food & NutritionTUALATIN SCHOOL HOUSE FOOD PANTRY: $4,000 · Food & NutritionWEST LINN FOOD PANTRY ORG: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,996,000Other$910,650Human Services$72,000Health$57,000Arts & Culture$48,000Employment$22,000Food & Nutrition$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,798,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $319,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP: $152,450 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetPEO Foundation: $101,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC: $48,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetVESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetPublic Safety Chaplaincy Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetEDWARDS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLake Oswego Meal Network Advisory Board: $16,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES: $16,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetVictory Academy Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWaterAfrica: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetSTORY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFathers Heart Street Ministry: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUALATIN SCHOOL HOUSE FOOD PANTRY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR UNITED VILLAGES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITIES PREGNANCY NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAILKEEPERS OF OREGON: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWEST LINN FOOD PANTRY ORG: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFossil School District 21J Education Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds PEO Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds VESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Public Safety Chaplaincy Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDWARDS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Lake Oswego Meal Network Advisory Board ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES ↗
  • Who funds Victory Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds WaterAfrica ↗
  • Who funds STORY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds PALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Fathers Heart Street Ministry ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Collins Foundation · Bp Lester & Regina John Foundation · Clark Foundation · R H Parkerunited Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hart Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hart Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Edwards Center Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc: 28% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Trailkeepers of Oregon: 19% of income from government
  • Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp: 18% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • Community Transitional School: 7% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hart Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hart Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hart Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph