· Private foundation
R H Parkerunited Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k70 grants · $198k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $268k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $205k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WILLAMETTE FALLS TRUST | $150,000 |
| FOUNDATION 36 | $55,000 |
| PSU FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER | $30,000 |
| AFSA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $27,500 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $20,000 |
| HELP NOW ADVOCACY CENTER | $20,000 |
| OMSI | $15,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S COURSE | $15,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $15,000 |
| TREEHOUSE THERAPIES ASSOC | $15,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SAND MOUNTAIN SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| BUILDING HOMES FOR HEROES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $294k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AEAFSA EDUCATION FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $87k · revenue +22%
- TCTHE CHILDRENS COURSE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +8%
- TTTreehouse Therapies Associates5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- SCSANTIAM CANYON WILDFIRE RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2020 · $100k
- SDSTEVENSON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $52k · revenue -30%
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.
Develop young people for the challenges and opportunities of life through the game of soccer.
The mission of the Oregon Sports Authority, dba Sport Oregon, is to drive economic growth and enhance quality of life in Oregon through sports. This is accomplished through our work with state and regional tourism bureaus, event promoters,…
To provide the youth of Portland area communities with the opportunity to experience the joy and thrill of soccer in a player centered environment. The main focus is on FUN and DEVELOPMENT with age appropriate training and coaching where…
Fc portland is an inclusive, community-minded, world-class development club which, through the best overall coach and player soccer programs, provides youth with personal growth, on and off the field.
Provide organized soccer to the youth of oregon city and the surrounding area.
Provide sports training and athletic competition for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
To foster an environment that promotes the physical, mental, and emotional development of oregon's youth through the sport of soccer.
To allow children ages four and above to learn the game of soccer on teams of various skill levels.
To elevate the game of soccer through development of the whole player.
The boys and girls club of southwestern oregon operates for the sole benefit of the children of the community. the club provides athletic and education opportunities that would otherwise not be available to over 4,000 children annually.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Metro Portland New Car Dealers Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILLAMETTE FALLS TRUST ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION 36 INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Tahoe Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds AFSA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS COURSE INC ↗
- Who funds Treehouse Therapies Associates ↗
- Who funds Trashmasters International Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S HOME ↗
- Who funds STEVENSON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BUILDING HOMES FOR HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Full Circle Programs ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FOR KLICKITAT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HIGH DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OREGON JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization R H Parkerunited Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Marie Mills Center Inc — 83% of income from government
- Youth Progress Association — 29% of income from government
- Clatsop Community Action — 26% of income from government
- Mid-Columbia Senior Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- Reach Community Development Inc — 18% of income from government
- Youth 71FIVE Ministries — 16% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Relay Resources — 9% of income from government
- Northwest Pilot Project — 6% of income from government
- Solve — 5% of income from government
- Portland Rose Festival Foundation — 1% of income from government
- University of Portland — 1% of income from government
- Fort Kennedy — 1% of income from government
- Community Connection of Ne Oregon Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to R H Parkerunited Foundation?
Find your warmest path to R H Parkerunited Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.