Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harry and Flora D Freund Memorial Foundation C/O Patterson Belknap

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$45kArts & Culture$22kEnvironment$19kEducation$6kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$4kCommunity Improvement$3kRecreation & Sports$2kReligion$2kOther$48k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$324k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC$3,500
CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN$2,500
PUBLIC ART FUND$2,000
SEEDS OF PEACE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FRIEND OF THE EVERGREEN$1,000
KNUCKLE BUMP FARM FOUNDATION$1,000
SAVING HUEY FOUNDATION$1,000
SECOND CHANCE RESCUE INC$1,000
ANIMAL HAVEN$1,000
PAWS 2 CARE COALITION$500
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$500
ANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 62% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAVING HUEY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%NY BULLY CREW: $1k → 7%WASSAIC PROJECT: $4k → 9%ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1k → 9%SECOND CHANCE RESCUE INC: $1k → 13%ST PETER'S EPISOPAL CHURCH: $2k → 14%ROTHKO CHAPEL: $2k → 16%CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%KNUCKLE BUMP FARM FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%PAWS 2 CARE COALITION: $3k → 13%COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE WOMEN - NY BILLING: $1k → 15%UMSL MARINE WORLD ECOLOGY: $3k → 11%ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATE: $2k → 21%ANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE: $2k → 13%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $6k → 10%SAVING HUEY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%A PURPOSEFUL RESCUE INC: $1k → 14%NY BULLY CREW: $1k → 7%WASSAIC PROJECT: $1k → 9%ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1k → 9%ST PETER'S EPISOPAL CHURCH: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF JANES CAROUSEL INC: $2k → 20%PAWS 2 CARE COALITION: $2k → 13%UMSL MARINE WORLD ECOLOGY: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $2k → 21%ANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE: $2k → 13%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $6k → 10%SAVING HUEY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF LONDON LIBRARY INC: $3k → 17%PAWS 2 CARE COALITION: $1k → 13%UMSL MARINE WORLD ECOLOGY: $3k → 11%ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATE: $2k → 21%ANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE: $1k → 13%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $4k → 10%SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK: $3k → 13%PUBLIC ART FUND: $2k → 17%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $2k → 10%THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $8k → 17%BARNARD COLLEGE: $2k → 17%THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $2k → 17%ART21: $3k → 17%FABIEN COUSTEAU OCEAN LEARNINGCENTER INC: $5k → 17%CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 17%ANIMAL HAVEN: $2k → 17%SEEDS OF PEACE: $2k → 17%SEEDS OF PEACE: $1k → 17%SEEDS OF PEACE: $1k → 17%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
NY
CA
MO
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$118k · 21 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$118k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+24%

Still filing today

71%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P2
    PAWS 2 CARE COALITION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +61%
  • TS
    THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +53%
  • AH
    ANIMAL HAVEN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • AM
    American Museum of Natural History
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +4%
  • AI
    ART21 INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +5%
  • SS
    SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
American Alliance for Protection of Animals Aapa Inc

American Alliance for Protection of Animals is a not for profit charity organization based in New York City, that protects animals and promotes animal welfare. We educate and spread awareness about animal cruelty and neglect and puppy…

Animals
5
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
6
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
7
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
8
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
9
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
10
Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law and Policy Inc
Philanthropy
11
Pet Pride of New York Inc

Pet pride of new york has been saving homeless cats and matching them with caring adopters since 1977. we operate a no-kill cat sanctuary and adoption center with an on-site veterinary medical center where we shelter and care for cats and…

Animals
12
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public Art Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Community FoundationsWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%46%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE — $17,500 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGEUMSL MARINE WORLD ECOLOGY — $7,500 · OtherUMSL MARINE WORLD ECOLOGYTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE GREATER CAPITAL DISTRICT — $3,500 · OtherTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE GREATE…ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATE — $3,500 · OtherST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATEST PETER'S EPISOPAL CHURCH — $3,100 · OtherST PETER'S EPISOPAL CHURCHCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherPUBLIC ART FUND INC — $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $2,000 · OtherSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC — $2,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF JANE'S CAROUSEL INC — $2,000 · Other+7 more — $5,400 · Other+7 morePAWS 2 CARE COALITION INC — $10,400 · AnimalsPAWS 2 CARE COALITION INCSAVING HUEY FOUNDATION — $9,500 · AnimalsSAVING HUEY FOUNDATIONANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE INC — $8,400 · AnimalsANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE INCANIMAL HAVEN INC — $5,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HAVEN INCLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA — $3,500 · AnimalsLewa Wildlife Conservancy USASECOND CHANCE RESCUE INC — $3,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE RESCUE INCKNUCKLE BUMP FARMS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Animals+5 more — $3,000 · Animals+5 moreTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO MUSEU…American Museum of Natural History — $6,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum …THE WASSAIC PROJECT INC — $4,500 · Arts & CultureTHE WASSAIC PROJ…ART21 INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureART21 INC+1 more — $300 · Arts & CultureCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $9,000 · EnvironmentCAPTAINS FOR C…FABIEN COUSTEAU OCEAN LEARNING CENTER I NC — $7,000 · EnvironmentFABIEN COUSTEA…PEACE RIVER BOTANICAL & SCULPTURE GARDEN — $2,000 · EnvironmentPEACE RIVER BO…+2 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentBARNARD COLLEGE — $3,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE LONDON LIBRARY INC — $2,500 · EducationSEEDS OF PEACE INC — $4,500 · InternationalCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · Philanthropy
Other$53,500Animals$44,800Arts & Culture$22,300Environment$19,000Education$5,500International$4,500Philanthropy$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPAWS 2 CARE COALITION INC — $10,400 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetSAVING HUEY FOUNDATION — $9,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE INC — $8,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFABIEN COUSTEAU OCEAN LEARNING CENTER I NC — $7,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASSAIC PROJECT INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE GREATER CAPITAL DISTRICT — $3,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE RESCUE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetART21 INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE LONDON LIBRARY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF JANE'S CAROUSEL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKNUCKLE BUMP FARMS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPEACE RIVER BOTANICAL & SCULPTURE GARDEN — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRothko Chapel — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Purposeful Rescue Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE MISSION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals International — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETS HOUSE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harry and Flora D Freund Memorial Foundation C/O Patterson Belknap funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Harry and Flora D Freund Memorial Foundation C/O Patterson Belknap?

    Find your warmest path to The Harry and Flora D Freund Memorial Foundation C/O Patterson Belknap through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph