Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harper Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$650
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$64kHealth$8kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$3kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kHousing & Shelter$800Other$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$513
Median grant
4
States reached
$119k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGE EASTMAN HOUSE$650
STOP SOLDIER SUICIDE$532
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$526
PROJECT ALS$523
Individual grant recipient$515
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER ASSOCIATION$515
CAMP GOOD DAYS & SPECIAL TIMES$513
BEGIN AGAIN FOUNDATION$500
MIND UP- GOLDIE HAWN FOUNDATION$500
PLUTA CANCER FOUNDATION$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$350
Individual grant recipient$265
GENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM$225
GENESSEE VALLEY HUNT RACES$195
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%BEGIN AGAIN FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%BEGIN AGAIN FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 94% of The Harper Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 6% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Harper Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$75k · 11 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$75k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+25%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +17%
  • CG
    CAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • American Diabetes Association
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • RS
    ROCHESTER SERVICE ANIMAL TR FD
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SC
    SYRACUSE CHAPTER OF THE PROFESSIONAL HORSEMAN'S ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • PC
    PLUTA CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
4
American Physiological Society

Empowering scientists to understand life and improve health by advancing and communicating discoveries in physiology and medicine.

Health
5
Eb Research Partnership Inc

Eb research partnership is the largest organizaion dedicated to funding research for treatments and a cure for epidermolysis bullosa, a group of devastating and life threatening genetic skin disorders that affect children from birth.

Health
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

7
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
8
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
Global Coalition for Adaptive Research Inc

Our mission is pioneering collaborative, innovative clinical trials to speed the discovery and development of cures.

Health
12
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION — $62,998 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONROCHESTER SERVICE ANIMAL TR FD — $3,000 · Other+10 more — $7,804 · Other+10 moreAmerican Diabetes Association — $1,370 · HealthPROJECT ALS INC — $1,046 · HealthCURE CHILDHOOD CANCER ASSOCIATION — $828 · HealthSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC — $532 · HealthEQUICENTER INC — $500 · HealthGEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM — $2,550 · Arts & CultureGENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM — $405 · Arts & CultureCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC — $1,523 · Recreation & SportsBegin Again Foundation — $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 · Human ServicesEGYPT FIRE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Public Safety & DisasterPIBBLES & MORE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $300 · AnimalsThe Housing Council at PathStone Inc — $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$73,802Health$4,276Arts & Culture$2,955Recreation & Sports$1,523Human Services$1,500Public Safety & Disaster$500Animals$300Housing & Shelter$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM — $2,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC — $1,523 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $1,370 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC — $1,046 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBegin Again Foundation — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCURE CHILDHOOD CANCER ASSOCIATION — $828 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC — $532 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUICENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEGYPT FIRE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM — $405 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPIBBLES & MORE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Housing Council at PathStone Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paychex Charitable Foundation IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harper Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harper Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Harper Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph