Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hardy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$108kEnvironment$46kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$80,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER$80,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIBRARY OF AMERICAN LANDSCAPE HISTORY: $100 → 12%THE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $5k → 7%BOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER: $80k → 8%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $85 → 14%VOLT CITIZENS INC: $500 → 5%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%THE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $5k → 7%OPERA IDAHO: $9k → 8%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $85 → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%BOISE ART MUSUEM: $5k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%BOISE ART MUSUEM: $4k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 3 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$19k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY LIBRARY
    2× · 2019–2023 · $10k
  • BA
    BOISE ART MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +32%
  • NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES
    2× · 2019–2021 · $170 · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +119%
  • OI
    OPERA IDAHO INC
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +20%
  • VC
    VOLT CITIZENS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
2
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works

A national membership organization in the united states dedicated to the preservation of cultural material, the american institute for conservation of historic and artistic works plays a crucial role in establishing and upholding…

Community Improvement
7
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
8
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
9
Museum Associates

To serve the public through the collection, conservation, exhibition and interpretation of significant works of art from a broad range of cultures and historical periods, and through translation of these collections into meaningful…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
11
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Northwest Art

The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boise Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureBOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INCMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTOPERA IDAHO INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA IDAHO INCBOISE ART MUSEUM INC: $8,710 · Arts & CultureBOISE ART MUSEUM INC+2 more: $270 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45,150 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY LIBRARYIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyVOLT CITIZENS INC: $500 · Environment
Arts & Culture$107,980Other$55,150Philanthropy$5,000Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC: $80,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA IDAHO INC: $9,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOISE ART MUSEUM INC: $8,710 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLT CITIZENS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $170 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Simplot Company Foundation IncID13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hardy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hardy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hardy Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Hardy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hardy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph