Skip to content
The Haley Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Haley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$600k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$421k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$862kPhilanthropy$421kHuman Services$276kHealth$162kYouth Development$26kFood & Nutrition$13kCommunity Improvement$11kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $154k
  • $250k+1 grant · $421k
$1,010
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVECLEAR ASSETMARK CHARITABLE$421,265
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$54,000
THE CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION$50,000
CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING$50,000
VILLAGE ENTERPRISE$10,000
THE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FNDTN$8,900
IMPACT THE PALM BEACHES$1,465
DIGITAL VIBEZ INC$1,010
OPERATION SMILE$788
SAVE THE CHILDREN$520
NO KID HUNGRY$500
FISTULA FOUNDATION$415
ST JUDE$400
MEALS ON WHEELS$330
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE$126
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE VILLAGE CHICAGO: $2k → 14%THE VILLAGE CHICAGO: $2k → 14%THE VILLAGE CHICAGO: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$470k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.3M
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+36%

Still filing today

67%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $433k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $848k · revenue +84%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $121k · revenue +36%
  • TR
    THE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TALENTED TEEN CLUB INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +64%
  • GF
    GRANT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +276%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
3
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
4
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
5
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
6
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
7
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
8
Sign Fracture Care International

Sign partners with overseas surgeons to build sustainable orthopaedic capacity by donating education, instruments, and implants. by working with teaching hospitals and hosting educational conferences worldwide, sign equips surgeons to heal…

Health
9
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
10
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
11
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
12
Helen Keller International

Guided by her remarkable legacy of its co-founder, helen keller, helen keller intl partners with communities that are striving to overcome longstanding cycles of poverty. by delivering the essential building blocks of good health, sound…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $848,365 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONTHE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC: $30,400 · Health+1 more: $3,769 · HealthGIVECLEAR ASSETMARK CHARITABLE: $421,265 · OtherGIVECLEAR ASSETMARK CHARITABLECENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING: $271,190 · OtherCENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELINGTHE TALENTED TEEN CLUB INC: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $19,327 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $120,515 · PhilanthropyVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $10,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $3,536 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,566 · InternationalGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 · International+3 more: $227 · InternationalFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $330 · Food & NutritionLINCOLN PARK VILLAGE INC: $4,510 · Human ServicesDigital Vibez Inc: $1,010 · Youth DevelopmentBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $126 · Animals
Health$882,534Other$736,782Philanthropy$120,515International$17,579Food & Nutrition$10,330Human Services$4,510Youth Development$1,010Animals$126

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $848,365 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $120,515 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC: $30,400 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE TALENTED TEEN CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK VILLAGE INC: $4,510 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $3,769 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $3,536 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,566 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZANMI BENI FOUNDATION INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Haley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Haley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home