Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hale Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$86kHuman Services$68kAnimals$63kHealth$45kYouth Development$21kFood & Nutrition$13kMembership Benefit$11kCivil Rights$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,420
Median grant
12
States reached
$930k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRANBROOK SCHOOLS$13,500
T-REX$11,260
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$5,630
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$3,500
HAPPY LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION$2,815
Individual grant recipient$2,815
BAY VIEW ASSOCIATION$2,700
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$2,500
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,420
MERCY SHIPS$1,760
USO OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$1,500
FRED HUTCH CANCER CENTER$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$400
KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $350 → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $400 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $350 → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $350 → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $350 → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 23 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$286k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+6%

Still filing today

52%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +99%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +99%
  • GC
    GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TH
    The Hermitage No Kill Cat Sheltergraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +294%
  • AA
    APA ADOPTION CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • TW
    Tucson Wildlife Center Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

—
9
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
10
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
11
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Michigan Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRANBROOK SCHOOL: $64,500 · OtherCRANBROOK SCHOOLSALVATION ARMY: $24,250 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTRUVISION FOUNDATION: $21,164 · OtherTRUVISION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHAPPY LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION: $20,315 · OtherHAPPY LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTIONSHRINERS HOSPITALS: $15,322 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALSCRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $13,500 · OtherT-REX: $11,260 · OtherAPA ADOPTION CENTER: $10,632 · OtherMANATEE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES: $9,684 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · Other+17 more: $44,754 · Other+17 moreGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,510 · PhilanthropyGARY SINI…Mercy Ships Foundation: $1,821 · PhilanthropyMercy Shi…The Hermitage No Kill Cat Shelter: $11,622 · AnimalsTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $9,778 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $14,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,000 · Health+4 more: $1,300 · HealthGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $13,236 · Food & NutritionPORTLAND BURYING GROUND ASSOCI: $11,052 · Membership BenefitHospice of Michigan Inc: $6,350 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,300 · Human Services
Other$264,881Philanthropy$32,331Animals$21,650Health$17,900Food & Nutrition$13,236Membership Benefit$11,052Human Services$8,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $13,236 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hermitage No Kill Cat Shelter: $11,622 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPORTLAND BURYING GROUND ASSOCI: $11,052 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $9,778 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $6,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Florida Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BAY VIEW ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships Foundation: $1,821 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $1,760 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,442 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetParalyzed Veterans of America Mid-Atlantic Chapter: $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds The Hermitage No Kill Cat Shelter ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND BURYING GROUND ASSOCI ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY VIEW ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Paralyzed Veterans of America Mid-Atlantic Chapter ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hale Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hale Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hale Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph